MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25-10-17, 13:44
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,680
Default

Tony

Appreciate your well thought out replies to my queries and doubts. You really have put a lot of work into this.

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-10-17, 15:54
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Likewise Lang, I appreciate you taking the time to critique my thoughts and ideas and the evidence I present. I find that I learn a helluva lot more trying to defend my pet theories than I do in isolation. Sometimes I prove myself right, and sometimes I prove myself wrong, as with the Chullora date, but I find it equally satisfying as long I’m finding answers, and discovering new pieces of the puzzle. For example I wouldn’t have dug up Cam Finlay’s photos if you hadn’t queried the Chullora evidence. And I wouldn’t have presented the Chullora evidence if Mike hadn’t challenged my “leap” from Special Variation to production. Here again I proved myself wrong, because it turned out to be a repaint!
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-10-17, 01:40
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,680
Default

Tony

I assume it is in the same parade. What is it with the two last vehicles in the parade collection? Same unit, different scheme from the other carriers and from each other?

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-10-17, 03:36
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Lang if you’re referring to the two Mortar carriers and the 2pdr carrier, I believe these are in Khaki Green / Light Earth scheme, which Young criticized on 13 Sept 42: “These colours are useless for disruption as they are much too close in tone and merge at a very short distance.” You can see what he means in that photo.

027529 Sydney 12 Dec 42 carriers parade KG3 Light Earth camo - Copy.JPG

Note also the enlarged frontal pattern on the AT carrier and gun shield compared to the trial pattern, which is otherwise identical. Early disruptive patterns under MC301 were way too small, especially 3-tone patterns, and instructions were issued to make them “bolder”. I believe they were designed originally by Victorian DHS committee and not Dakin himself, although he seems to have approved them. I guess we need to bear in mind that disruptive camo was in its infancy.

4120551 (2).JPG
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-10-17, 05:42
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,680
Default

Yes, I can see the panels in direct sunlight do merge their colours.

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-10-17, 07:52
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,680
Default

Just had a look at Dakin. Interesting bloke. Absolutely no military experience or qualifications on the requirements of battlefield camouflage but knew a lot about fish.

In the end, a camouflage system can only be judged subjectively by human observation and probably anyone with a bit of common sense could have come up with equally efficient, or inefficient, schemes given the facilities and trials he had access to.

Still, nobody in Australia was an expert in 1940, so they must have figured a bloke who knew how fish avoided being eaten must be just the shot for hiding tanks on a battlefield.

Lang

http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/dakin-william-john-5863
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-10-17, 06:42
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
Absolutely no military experience or qualifications on the requirements of battlefield camouflage
Yes but you could say the same about CSIRO scientists consulted by Army in modern camo development. That’s all Dakin was for the military – a technical consultant. He only had authority over civil camouflage.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
anyone with a bit of common sense could have come up with equally efficient, or inefficient, schemes given the facilities and trials he had access to.
“In point of fact, excellent results can often be obtained by the exercise of common sense, imagination, and attention to detail; it is only in exceptional cases that the services of a specially trained officer should be required.”

EXCEPT…

“Disruptive painting is a positive menace when executed by the inexperienced; it should be left to experts.”

(Training memo 1940)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
Still, nobody in Australia was an expert in 1940
Exactly Lang, that was the whole problem, all the experience and expertise was within AIF and RAAF who were absent at the time. Plus of course Dakin had the ear of Menzies and promoted himself as Technical Director of Camouflage.


Simple Rules for Camouflage. Extract from Training Memorandum No.36 of 1940.jpg

War Cabinet April 1941 Establishment of Camouflage Organization. - Copy.jpg
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sold: Aust International Army Vehicles Parts Catalogue Mike Cecil For Sale Or Wanted 2 09-11-14 12:38
For Sale: WWII Brit Vehicles lssah2025 For Sale Or Wanted 0 18-09-14 15:17
10,000 WWII Vehicles for Sale! Ed Storey The Softskin Forum 3 25-01-11 12:05
Aust. vehicles web site Mike K The Softskin Forum 1 22-07-09 04:00
WWII vehicles in Burma Hanno Spoelstra The Softskin Forum 0 03-04-06 01:38


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016