MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28-04-15, 22:35
chrisgrove chrisgrove is offline
Chris
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ashford, Kent UK
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Coutts-Smith View Post
I do wonder what would have been the solution if the tanks had been too wide.
Rich.
Pleased that the solution has been found (though the Thorny I suggested has very similar louvres in the bonnet sides).

If the tanks are too wide, they do not travel by rail! The small British rail gauge (not the track gauge) bedevilled our tank design for many years. Eventually the designers had to ignore it, though most of the newer tanks were able to travel on contonental railways. Even those M10s are overhanging the warwells.

Chris
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Census numbers of ‘Wheeled’ transport held by The Calgary Regiment (Tank)) as/at 1 No Mark W. Tonner The Softskin Forum 4 15-02-11 19:04
England Geoff Winnington-Ball (RIP) The Sergeants' Mess 0 18-06-07 17:41
need help from england alleramilitaria The Softskin Forum 15 07-12-05 05:12
'Somewhere in England' No1 Pete Ashby The Softskin Forum 12 16-02-04 22:12


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016