![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Some main differences of note from standard MK-I* or updated MK-I* to MK-II: no firing rests, no smoke discharger, no 2” mortar, no AA pole socket mounts, no BREN, PIAT or Boys brackets or mounts of any description. Relocation of rations stowage box. No armoured wireless battery box. No wireless radio mounts, antenna bases or installed accessories. No small arms ammunition containers or ‘break-out’ pouch brackets and straps. The Canadian factory 3” mortar carriers were enhanced/customized in the field with welded equipment storage frames in addition to the mounting bases for attaching deep fording plates when so equipped. Dare I apply the term: “operational” ? I would feel pretty safe using the CT series of WD numbers for 3” mortar carriers, some examples are shown in the following images and single shipping document. Some known range of Canadian made 3” mortar carrier numbers: CT-113991-114026 (36); CT-162911-163910 (1,000); CT-201801-202100 (300) Last edited by Michael R.; 20-11-19 at 18:21. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carriers colour question | Luigi Manes | The Carrier Forum | 0 | 12-01-19 17:12 |
Question: Did all Mk2 carriers have mount blocks for fording plates? | Jim Burrill | The Carrier Forum | 4 | 09-06-16 00:13 |
Question about parking Carriers | Phil Waterman | The Carrier Forum | 2 | 09-04-09 12:27 |
Another question about Oil Filter Replacement with numbers | Dean (Ajax) | The Sergeants' Mess | 4 | 09-02-08 05:08 |
Question about a Royal Air Force “census numbers” list | rewdco | The Softskin Forum | 1 | 03-08-07 00:05 |