Privately owned armored military combat vehicles unfit for licensing in Kansas

[Bruce Parker (RIP)]

Reading the definition in Bill 2805, while anything made for the US military forces is an "historic military vehicle", anything that was not, is not. A CMP, despite looking for all the world like a military vehicle, would, in Kansa, be a 'special interest vehicle". I'm sure that's not what the drafters meant to say (if an American MV is dangereous and needs to be regulated, than all MV's should be equally dangerous and regulated). Is it possible the drafters of this legislation are so...slow...that they think the USA is the only user of MV's?