MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 21-04-05, 23:16
Richard Notton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Gas- and diesel-powered AFVs in the Allied armed forces

Quote:
Originally posted by Crewman
Hello,

At first quotation from the GOC 4th Canadian Armoured Division Maj.-Gen. George Kitching's memoirs:



It sounds a little like the Allies in the ETO had wide offer of the tanks and other AFVs to select gas- or diesel-powered vehicles for them. In fact majority of the vehicles were gas-powered. What the GOC of armoured division could do? Almost nothing, if I am not mistaken but maybe I am wrong? The Army's offer was not so great:

▪ M3A1 Stuart (or Stuart Mk. IV) powered by the Guiberson T-1020-4 Diesel engine

▪ M4A2 Sherman powered by GM 6046 diesel engine

▪ M10 tank destroyers and their Achilles versions powered by GM 6046 diesel engines


Did I miss any model? Was there a possibility for the GOC to select the tanks for his division?


Best regards

C.
I think these commanders at the time had faulty understanding, and the myth continues today, that petrol fuelled tanks were intrinsically prone to instantaneous fuel fires when hit.

In fact once ignited diesel has more heat output and is more difficult to extinguish, the main reason for the petrol fire myth is poor design in ammunition stowage.

The initiator is shell propellant and far more dangerous than petrol or diesel oil, it really makes no difference what the fuel is when just one case is ruptured and the resulting virtual aerosol of propellent charge is ignited.

German tanks did not catch fire readily at all and almost entirely owing to good design and therefore protection of the main gun ammunition. So much so that the average lay-man here at least has a belief that WWII German tanks were all diesel powered because when hit immediate fires didn't occur.

I think Hanno can add something to this, especially the Sherman mods that saw appliqué armour placed in the vulnerable places and IIRC some research that suggests American crewed Shermans went on fire at a rate 5 times greater pro rata than equivalent British operated vehicles because of the US practice of sneaking in extra main gun rounds wherever they could be tucked away.

R.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016