MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33  
Old 20-03-23, 05:18
Jacques Reed Jacques Reed is offline
VMVC
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 866
Default Ford CMP fuel sending units and Radio Suppression Condensers

A recent discussion on another forum about the use of Radio Suppression condensers (capacitors) on the fuel senders got me thinking about the design of the fuel sender unit on a Ford.

It was suggested that the condensers served another purpose which was to reduce arcing at the contacts inside the sender as it made and broke contact in operation. This is similar to the use of a condenser at the ignition points. This could be desirable on a device fitted close to fuel vapor; however, I think this was not necessary and the designers, (King Seeley?) didn’t consider it as an issue with a well-sealed unit.

Interestingly the condensers were only fitted “as required”, and not a standard fitment to all CMP vehicles which implies the senders were designed so that any arcing at the bimetal contact is satisfactorily shielded from petrol fumes or liquid. There is also the hot heating wire for the bimetal arm to consider.

I thought I would open up a unit for a close inspection. I had one which I had condemned for a hole eaten through the casing. I made sure there is no liquid inside it by shaking it vigorously as I would be using a Dremel cut off wheel to open it up. Even 50-year-old petrol is flammable.

As the photo shows it has some identifiable parts from the operating diagram. Virtually everything inside attached to the bimetal arm is insulated from earth. There is an adjustment cam for factory setting the starting contact point on the bimetal arm. This cam is insulated from the bimetal arm by what looks like a Bakelite pin. The movable arm on the bellows is earthed as is all the sender casing.

The unit is sealed with a substantial rubber gasket. As far as fumes leaking into the sender, this could only occur if the bellows had a hole in it, or the tank side of the sender had a hole (my condemned one) or there was a hole in the outside of the sender unit and fumes got in, such as in a during refuelling. Ignition should be switched off in any case during refuelling.

So, I think there is a low chance of a fire caused by a sender as long as it is good condition and not suffering from corrosion, or damaged in a way that the internals are exposed to vapor. Having said that, I would have a good check of any fuel sender unit for signs of holes or damage before putting it into service.

Will be interested to hear other comments on this.

Hope this is of some interest.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Fuel sender- C01Q 9275.jpg (186.8 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg fuel guage test.jpg (242.4 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg fuel guage operation.jpg (266.4 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0128.JPG (143.6 KB, 0 views)
__________________
F15-A 1942 Battery Staff

Jacques Reed

Last edited by Jacques Reed; 20-03-23 at 08:36. Reason: Changed capacitor to condenser to agree with Ford nomenclature.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photo comes Alive in New Westminster B.C. r.morrison WW2 Military History & Equipment 3 11-10-14 09:34
History comes alive in Winchelsea Ryan Military Shows & Events 27 09-05-13 19:24
wanted dead or alive.... Roland Koster The Carrier Forum 1 12-03-07 22:24
Its Alive!!! Brad Mills The Carrier Forum 10 14-07-06 20:02
ITS ALIVE!, again Jordan Baker The Carrier Forum 4 15-10-04 20:54


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016