MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > The Wireless Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-20, 02:34
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,599
Default KNOBS, Phenolic, FLUTED w/Crank ZA/CAN 4698

Here are three photos of what the KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted looked like prior to cleaning them up.

David
Attached Images
File Type: jpg KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted 1.JPG (163.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted 2.JPG (170.6 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted 3.JPG (166.8 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-20, 02:45
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Dunlop View Post
Here are three photos of what the KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted looked like prior to cleaning them up.

David
Dammit man...YOU HAVE TO SHOW THE CLEANED UP ONES!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-20, 02:50
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,599
Default KNOBS, Phenolic, FLUTED w/Crank ZA/CAN 4698

Your Wish is my Obligation, Bruce.

Here are three photos of the KNOBS cleaned and polished, but with the brass Crank assembly not yet re-paintd.

David
Attached Images
File Type: jpg KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted 4.JPG (177.7 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted 5.JPG (170.3 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted 6.JPG (180.2 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-20, 03:02
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,599
Default

Here is a photo of the Sender with both KNOBS, Phenolic, Fluted assemblies cleaned, re-painted and reinstalled.

Now I have to do some more research into the remaining black phenolic knobs on the Sender. Mainly having to sort out the 'glow in the dark' stuff originally applied at the factory.

David
Attached Images
File Type: jpg WS No. 52 Sender 71.JPG (249.1 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-20, 23:16
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,599
Default Wireless Paint

Something I have been meaning to get down in writing for quite a while now, and while I have been mulling over a closely related painting subject in my head, decided this was as good a time as any to get my thoughts and observations written down and out of the way.

Designing and building anything as complex as a wireless set, at any time, is a major undertaking, compounded even more so during wartime because of the increased likelihood of unavailable, or disrupted parts supply chains. Efficient production, however, remains pretty much at a high importance level.

An assembly line has to be designed with the highest level of efficiency, in order to keep the cost of production as low as possible, thereby optimizing profits, without sacrificing quality of the product being manufactured. That is where the Production Engineering Department of a major company like Canadian Marconi Company, earns its keep. Time, space, human resources and parts cannot be wasted. A line must flow as smoothly and logically as possible. With a minimum number of steps.

One of the things that puzzled me for a while was wartime and later photographs of 52-Sets where various parts on the front panels of the sets appeared colour mismatched to the majority of the set. I was already aware that varnish was used on the front of a wireless set to protect the water transfer decals applied to the front of it, and that most, if not all of these varnishes discoloured over time. Some more rapidly than others. My assumption, therefore, was that from time to time, parts on the front of a set would get damaged, requiring replacement. These brand new parts would be installed and having been wrapped up in a box for a while, would not show as much discoloured varnish patina as the rest of the set, so stood out in photos. But then I started to notice it was always the same large parts that stood out, these being typically the round Covers on the Blower Motors, the Access Door on the Sender and the front plate of the Receiver Vibrator Supply section of the Main Set Supply Unit. That observation made no sense to me at all initially.

Then I noticed something. None of these parts have water transfer decals on them. There was absolutely no need for them to be varnished. That would be a complete waste of time, workstation space, varnish and manpower. The most efficient production of those parts would simply have been to construct them, paint them Gloss Navy Grey and then either have them individually packaged as part of the required Spare Parts quota for the contract, or be bulk packaged for delivery to the assembly line at a specific installation station. Front panels, and any other part with water transfer decals would have been painted Gloss Navy Grey, had decals applied, any finishing work added and then been varnished before either packaging as spares, or headed to assembly.

On taking a closer look at all the 52-Set panels, and 19-Set panels. I have available at this point, I noticed several other smaller parts that match up with this type of assembly line flow.

- HANDLES, No. 72:

The large square handle on the centre dials to move quickly between the two preselected Flick Frequencies. 6 of 7 are original Gloss Navy Grey. One has been varnished.

- HANDLES, No. 80:

The small Flick Levers to the right of each dial. 7 of 10 are original Gloss Navy Grey. Three are varnished.

- KNOBS, Metal 10-32 thd No. C1:

The round push/pull knobs for getting the components in and out of their carriers. 9 out of 11 are original Gloss Navy Grey. Two are varnished.

So based on these considerations, if one had a brand new out of the box 19-Set, or 52-Set, there would be no colour differentiation at all across the front of the set. Over time with no overhauls and gracious aging, patina would develop on all varnished parts, whereas the above noted items would remain factory original Gloss Navy Grey.

Consequently, with the restoration underway with my 52-Set, all decaled parts will be reasonably matched to a slight patina shade of grey and these noted parts would be done Gloss Navy Grey. You can see the start of this plan on the Sender front panel already, where the round COVERS for the Blower and the two KNOBS Metal are Gloss Navy Grey. Once I had used the Access Door to match the panel paint to the patina I was looking for, I had intended to continue polishing the Door back to its original Gloss Navy Grey, but when looking at some of the original photos when it arrived, I noticed one could see the correct grey on the COVERS still showing, but the door matched the rest of the front panel, so I have decided that exception will serve to make the rule and also maintain another small bit of the Sender’s history.

David
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-12-20, 03:53
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,599
Default 52-Set Test Jumper Cables

While reading through the surviving bits and pieces of the 52-Set RCEME Maintenance Manual, I ran across references to a pair of Jumper Cables intended for bench test work when aligning and calibrating the 52-Set.

These Jumper Cables allowed the entire 52-Set in its Carriers No. 4 to be placed on the back portion of a bench and an individual component removed from the Carriers Assembly and pulled forward and out of the Carriers. The Jumper(s) would then be inserted into the Plug(s) in the rear of the Carriers No. 4 and the Socket(s) on the back of the component being tested, so the entire 52-Set would be running as a complete entity while the individual components were under test.

I have not yet considered the wiring in these Jumper Cables but for the moment am assuming they were both identical and all 8 contacts would have been connected 1 to 1 etc, each end. Otherwise you would need five separate Jumper Cables and need to keep track of which were used where.

The whole concept seemed a bit odd, although interesting.

Then, earlier this year, I ran across some photographs somewhere of a Canadian Marconi Company built wartime RCN Wireless Set. The same 8-pin Plugs and Sockets were used to connect the individual components of this RCN Wireless to one another, and in one photo of the front of the complete set, sitting in a holder on the left side of the set, were a pair of Jumper Cables, about 4 to 6 feet long with the appropriate 8-pin Plugs and Sockets either end. So, these Jumper Cables must have existed and I am curious if anyone has ever run across a set? They would be a useful thing to find, or replicate.

David
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-20, 18:03
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,599
Default 52-Set Test Jumper Cables

I think these cables were part of CMC’s CM-11 Wireless Set used by the RCN. Now I have to see if I can remember where I saw the photos of them.

Too many brain cells, or not enough electrons?...Sheesh.

David
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canadian staff car wireless: World War 2 Canadian R103 Receiver Demo Mike K The Wireless Forum 5 24-07-16 15:20
Found: CMP Wireless body project Jim Burrill For Sale Or Wanted 7 05-04-15 00:02
Canadian dehavilland mosquito restoration project David Dunlop WW2 Military History & Equipment 9 10-07-14 00:51
Canadian project David Ellery The Carrier Forum 9 28-04-07 01:36
FOR SALE/TRADE: 1944 CHOREHORSE PROJECT for Signal Corps Wireless Power Unit Project Alain For Sale Or Wanted 1 21-02-07 00:11


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016