MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old 13-08-20, 18:16
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

The problem with tare weight is that it includes both cab and chassis (made by Chevrolet/GM/GMH and body (often made by a separate manufacturer) .
It is easy for the chassis builder to give the weight of their part of the truck, also easy for them to give the gross capacity but less easy for them to give tare which is only known after the body is fitted, often by someone else. That said, there was a period when Ford and Chevrolet did sell complete trucks (dump, stake, platform etc.) and I don't know if the weight tags for those vehicles would have shown tare or if the same blank tags were used for all trucks, complete or not...
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
military converter dolly James Fritz Auction and Classified Ad Site Heads Up 0 13-06-18 23:14
Towing a Iltis with a dolly SteveB Post-war Military Vehicles 9 15-05-15 21:40
Guy Ant gs truck in BEF phantom16 The Softskin Forum 11 07-12-06 17:57
FWD WW1 truck Wayne Henderson The Softskin Forum 3 27-01-06 20:18
Australian Army trailer Dolly cliff The Softskin Forum 5 22-08-05 08:35


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016