![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This week has been another busy one with getting the hull and engine ready for the installation, and then setting everything up once inside.
After another successful test run, I stripped everything off the engine that could potentially get in the way or get damaged while it was being fitted. I also gave the engine bay a freshen up with some new paint. There were lots of marks and scuffs from the many times I’ve got in and out of the thing! Ed gave me a hand again. We used a strop on the front part of the engine and a strop and chain block on the gearbox end. One of the guys from Action Engineering next door came in with the Hiab truck and we were set to go. I’d have to say the installation of the engine and gearbox assembly was straightforward. The hiab crane made it easy and gave us the height and manoeverability we needed. I was guiding the motor in from the rear of the hull so I didn’t get a picture from the side but you do need quite a pitch on the assembly to get the gearbox under the cross member in the hull. Then it was just a matter of lowering the front of the engine and raising the gearbox end. A short time later I had the engine mounting pins in and the large bolts through the bellhousing mounts into the engine mounts on the cross member in the hull. While the engine and gearbox assembly was straightforward, the radiator installation was a pain in the butt. The radiator was one of the few things I did not test fit. I didn’t see the point as there were only the two mounts and its positioning would be determined a little by the fan positioning once the engine was in, right? You might recall that I have reproduction engine mounts, back plate that sits under the engine mounts, and radiator shrouds. The order in which to fit the radiator is to put the fan shrouds over the pulleys, fit the fans, then lower the radiator and fit the shrouds to the radiator. Easy eh? It wasn’t so straightforward for me. The first problem we struck was with the reproduction back plate that sits under the steel engine mounts and over the pintle hook. The cavity in the plate for the pintle hook was too long (toward the front of the vehicle) and extended under the radiator by about 1/2". The result was that the radiator would not come low enough and kept sitting on this raised piece at the back of the plate. I was was left with little option but to get the grinder and cut off disc out and cut a small section of this raised piece out. This allowed the radiator to come down low enough so that it was starting to line up with the fans. The second problem was in aligning the radiator and shrouds with the fans. I had already had to slot some of the mounting holes on the reproduction shrouds so that the holes lined up with the captive nuts on the radiator, and I don’t think these shrouds were a great reproduction either. The radiator still seemed too low in relation to the motor though and I found I had to use three of the small rubber packers (instead of the one specified in the manual) under each radiator mount to get it to the height required to line up with the fans, once the shrouds were fitted. I started to suspect the rear engine mounts then. Thanks to Stewart, he confirmed the height of the engine mount at 3 3/8" at the engine end and 1 5/16" at the other end. I measured mine and they measure 3 9/16" at the engine end and 1 5/16" at the other end. So, the engine mounts are holding the front of the engine 3/16” too high. That would account for one of the extra spacers but that would still leave the radiator too high. As it is, the radiator is only sitting about 3 mm above the engine mounts so there is not a lot of room and I'm not sure I would want to go too much lower for the preservation of the radiator. Were there differences in the radiators and potentially the radiator mounts in the hull? Where the radiator sits now (with three spacers) it looks about right for height but as I say, the mounts in the hull appear too low. I fitted the plates under the fuel filter. They are not easy to access and fit. Interestingly, the one at the front that sits under the gas tank, will only go in if you remove the gearbox filler plug. Otherwise, this obstructs the fitment of the plate. I received the new brush springs for the starter motor. These were shown as being replacements for the original brush springs which are part number AL- MZ19. I don’t think they are correct as the end of the spring does not fit centrally on the brush. However, I have ‘adpated’ them to fit and I’m hoping they will do the job. That’s it for this week….
__________________
Cheers, Darryl Lennane 1943 Willys MB 1941 Willys MBT Trailer 1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier 1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car 1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car 1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More photos.
__________________
Cheers, Darryl Lennane 1943 Willys MB 1941 Willys MBT Trailer 1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier 1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car 1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car 1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
With Covid19 here, I haven’t been able to do much to the M8, but prior to the lockdown I got a few things done. I fitted all the bits and pieces back onto the engine after I had stripped it back for the installation. Ed and I fired up the engine again and it went well. It looks like my tweak with the starter motor brush springs has done the job. I note though that I have got coolant seeping from the water pump elbow and the thermostat housing where it bolts to the head so It looks like I will have to drain the radiator and fix those up. Bugger. Thanks to Michael for his tips on my generator problems. You will recall I didn’t think the generator was charging. I had previously read about polarising the generator but just assumed that the auto electrician would have done this when he tested it. Anyway, Michael suggested I check on this and sure enough it was the problem. I did a whole lot more reading again about generator polarising and confirmed I needed to establish what type of grounding my generator had before trying to polarise it. I had read that if you have a non-insulated Field terminal on the generator case, then it was likely you had a Type B grounded generator which is one which is internally grounded. The generator on the M8 was certainly one with a non-insulated field terminal but just to be sure I checked the resistance between the field terminal on the generator and the generator case, while I lifted the brushes. The continuity remained the same which confirmed a Type B internally grounded generator. Once I confirmed that, I removed the Field wire from the Regulator and flashed that field wire to the positive terminal on the battery. Once connected back up to the regulator, that did the trick and I then had a generator that was charging the battery. I fitted the lower engine covers around the battery side of the engine. I have to say, it does make the engine area look really smart. I need to modify the brake line going into the hydrovac though as the way I have folded it, it won’t allow me to fit the lower engine cover on that side. I made up a rod for activating the carburettor arm from the throttle slave cylinder. I made it straight although I have seen a number of variations; straight and with several bends in it. The straight one works well in my setup though and the hydraulic throttle works well. You might recall I had a Voltmeter and Ammeter that weren’t working. I figured I would have a crack at seeing what the problem was with the voltmeter. This is a Stewart Warner voltmeter and not sure if you have ever tried fixing one of these but for starters you have to get the bezel off. I used a small screwdriver with a bent tip on it, to pry the edges of the bezel up. It takes some time so you have to be patient. Once you have the bezel off, you need to remove the assembly from the outer housing. There are two insulators holding the positive and negative terminals and you have to remove these first. Once they are off, you can push the assembly out of the housing. There are two small rivets holding the faceplate on. I couldn’t see a way to easily remove them without damaging the gauge so I filed the ends of the rivets off and just pushed them out. Once inside you can see the bi-metal strip that is connected to the pointer. When this is connected to a power supply, the bi-metal strip bends and the pointer moves. In testing, I found the circuit on the voltmeter was open. I couldn’t quite work out why as everything appeared to be connected, albeit through glue holding the wires onto the terminal posts. I eventually found that the wire from one end of the bi-metal strip was not connected to the positive post, despite it being glued down to the terminal along with the other wire. I’m not sure how this would have ever worked but it looked like it had been glued in place, but had never ever made contact with the terminal post. I’m not used to dealing with wires that are the thickness of cotton but I removed that wire from the glue, wrapped it around the other wire and then tried to connect it to the positive terminal. I couldn’t get solder to take to the terminal so in the end, I left a blob of solder on the wire and using a drop of super glue, connected it to the terminal post. I fitted it to the instrument panel and tested it and it worked. I couldn’t reuse the rivets so I put a small droplet of glue on each side of the wee panel. I then cleaned up the bezel, fitted it and folded over the edges of the bezel. Job done. Haha. Back to the engine, and all you clutch gurus….. I’m having some clutch issues and would be keen to get some ideas from you all. I was a bit suspicious about the clutch before we put the engine in, but we did appear to get some pressure so I ran with it. After bleeding the clutch though, there is a problem. The issue seems to be that the fingers on the clutch pressure plate are compressed too much during assembly of the pressure plate and clutch disc. When you activate the clutch using the arm on the side of the housing, there is about 10mm free play in the arm, and then about 25 mm of ‘soft’ throw in the arm. I say soft, as it appears that it is just the release bearing movement on the shaft I can feel, and only finger strength is required to move it. The arm ends up in roughly just past the vertical position at the end of its travel. As a result, the disc is not released. I’ve had the clutch and gearbox in and out now a couple of times and it is still not right. Here’s what I’ve done/checked: • The clutch release bearing assembly looks correct. The yoke and arm are as I received them and were already wired. They match the configuration in the manual. • The clutch release bearing is a recommended replacement model. It is about 90mm in diameter while the inside diameter of the fingers is 70mm. The clutch release bearing has about 25mm of travel on the retainer on the main shaft. • I’ve put the clutch disc in the right way, with the long end of the hub toward the flywheel. This puts the raised portion of the hub inside the circular opening in the pressure plate. Note that the 1943 TM 9-743 manual suggests fitting the clutch with the short end of the hub to the flywheel. This error was corrected in the 1944 TM 9-743 manual and described in an issue of Army Motors. The disc will go in the other way around but I imagine the springs on the hub would clash with the crankshaft bolts. • The clutch disc fits neatly and flat on the flywheel face. The end of the hub on the clutch disc is clear of the pilot bearing so it is not bottoming out on that. • I have examined the pressure plate and the clutch disc alongside a spare pressure plate and clutch disc. They are the same diameters and thicknesses, to within a couple of millimetres. The height of the pressure plate face and fingers within its housing is the same as the spare pressure plate, again to within a couple of millimetres. The pressure plates are as I received them and they have not been professionally set up. • I wrote a while ago about the differences between the White Scout car and M8 clutches. The Scout car pressure plate is bigger so won’t fit, so the clutch pressure plate on this is correct. • From what I’ve seen, the M8 hub setup on the clutch disc is different to the White Scout Car, with the short end of the splined shaft on the raised portion of the hub on the M8. The White Scout car hub has the long end of the splined shaft on the raised portion of the hub. I think I have this right, but thinking about it, I don’t think it would matter. Interestingly, I saw a picture of someone restoring a Scout Car clutch and the clutch disc in that was the same as these M8 (?) ones. • Each time I have fitted the disc and pressure plate I have ensured the disc is central on the flywheel and under the pressure plate. The raised portion of the hub sits neatly in the middle of the pressure plate with about 10mm of clearance around the circumference of the circular opening. • I’ve been using an old output shaft to align the clutch disc during the tightening of the pressure plate. The output shaft doesn’t go fully into the pilot bearing because of the threaded section on the end, but it is enough to align the disc. The gearbox fits into the bellhousing and engages with the pilot bearing without any problems. It bolts up neatly, so I believe I have everything aligned, otherwise the gearbox wouldn’t slot into place. • The flywheel is an original one with new ring gear fitted. It appears to be seated on the crankshaft and in the bell housing correctly, but I have nothing else here that I can compare the depth to. • When the pressure plate and clutch disc assembly is tightened down on the flywheel, the fingers on the pressure plate drop around 20-22mm from their neutral position. This seems excessive to me and I think this is the problem. The fingers end up so low that the release bearing is not making contact with them. What have I missed? Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks.
__________________
Cheers, Darryl Lennane 1943 Willys MB 1941 Willys MBT Trailer 1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier 1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car 1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car 1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More photos.
__________________
Cheers, Darryl Lennane 1943 Willys MB 1941 Willys MBT Trailer 1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier 1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car 1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car 1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
The Covid lockdown has slowed things down for me on the M8 but some progress has been made since we moved to Level 2 lockdown. I fixed the joints around the water pump elbow and thermostat housing where coolant was seeping out. So far, so good, so hopefully that will cure my leaking problems. I refitted the lower engine panels around the engine. I couldn’t find an easy way to fit the panel on the exhaust side without removing the length of exhaust header which is bolted to the manifold. Has anyone else found this? I would have thought the panel would have been made so that it could be removed without disturbing the exhaust header pipe. The fitted panels certainly make the area around the engine bay look nice and neat. I am not satisfied with the Hydrovac vacuum setup that I have so I will tidy that up a bit more over the next week. I have fitted the repaired voltmeter back into the instrument panel and that is working well. I resolved my clutch issues by replacing the pressure plate. I’m not really sure how this did it, as the plates looked identical. However, I was did confirm that my original measurements were out by some 12mm so my original diagnosis of the problem wasn’t as bad as I had thought. I fitted the new pressure plate and gradually tightened it, while periodically sliding the transmission into and out of place and ensuring that there was still contact between the release bearing and the pressure plate fingers right through until I had fully tightened the pressure plate. I can only guess that the other pressure plate needed some adjustment. I am happy that it is resolved now though. Once I was sure I had the clutch physically working I bled the clutch hydraulics using the pressure bleeder. This pressure bleeder does work well. What do you guys do for the bleed screw on the clutch slave cylinder? I have the original military type with the small ¼” ‘dust cap’ screw in the top of the bleed screw. I’ve found that during bleeding using the original bleeder, with the tapered thread, the fluid tends to come up the threads and spill out around the base of the bleeder before it works its way up the centre of the bleeder (with the dust cap off) and into the hose going into a jar. I actually replaced the bleeder with a modern bleed screw with a bleeder nipple built into the top. It was the same thread (7/16-20) but what I didn’t realise is that the original bleeder has a tapered thread and the new one with the straight thread doesn’t seal properly. How were these cylinders originally bled? Was it done the same way? Was it just a matter of them being loosened during the bleeding and allowing fluid to come out over the side of the cylinder? Is there a bleeder available with a tapered thread and a proper bleed nipple on the top? The clutch now does work hydraulically and there is some satisfaction in seeing the slave cylinder operate while pushing the pedal! Thanks to Jonathan for his video of the clutch arm in operation as this showed the correct movement of the arm, and confirmed that I had everything set up correctly. The next time I am in the workshop I will run the engine with the drive-shafts disconnected and see if the clutch allows me to work my way through the gears in the gearbox which will tell me I have the clutch adjusted right. It looks good so far though. I adjusted all the brakes and they have a good feel to them. However, I now have a problem with the wheel cylinders. The wheel cylinders were all stainless steel sleeved and I used NOS cups on the pistons which looked and felt good before I fitted them. After bleeding though, I noticed that four of the wheels were leaking hydraulic fluid though. I took two wheels off and the fluid appeared to have worked its way past both top and bottom cups on both wheel cylinders on both wheels, creating a small pool of hydraulic fluid at the bottom of the drum. One wheel was considerably worse than the other. I removed both cylinders on both wheels, pulled them apart and couldn’t see anything wrong with the cups or the bores. My initial thought was that the original cups weren’t as effective with the modern brake fluid (Dot 4) and that perhaps the brake fluid back then had a higher viscosity. My other thought was that it was possible that the sleeves were made slightly too big for the original cups, but this was all done by my brake guy so it seemed unlikely. In the end, I took a wheel cylinder and pistons to a seal manufacturer and they made me a small number of new cups, enough to do two wheels. When I got them back I found the new cups to be a very tight fit on the pistons and they looked to have a bit more material contacting the bore. I fitted these and bled the brakes, confident that it would solve my leaking problems. However, within a day of bleeding the brakes, the cylinders appear to be leaking again. I now wonder if the guy who fitted the sleeves didn’t seal the sleeve inside the cylinder properly and that the hydraulic fluid is working its way out between the sleeve and the cylinder. I plan to remove the drums again, remove the wheel cylinder caps and get a buddy to press the brake pedal gently to see if I can see where the fluid is coming out. I’m not sure how easy that will be to see but otherwise I figure the best bet is to return a couple of these cylinders to my brake guy so that he can bench test them. Apart from the wheel cylinder problems, it is a good feeling knowing that all the hydraulics do actually work; throttle, clutch and brakes. That is all for this week….
__________________
Cheers, Darryl Lennane 1943 Willys MB 1941 Willys MBT Trailer 1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier 1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car 1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car 1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More photos.
__________________
Cheers, Darryl Lennane 1943 Willys MB 1941 Willys MBT Trailer 1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier 1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car 1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car 1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice looking Brakes
![]() I have a question I am the other crew member helping Brian B. on the ONTAR museum M8 repair, have you honed or re-sleeved your brake Cylinders? We have just reinstalled some new used cylinders which we honed and they are leaking. So we thought the only way to fix them now is to put a sleeve into them since they are pitting from the brake fluid, bare in mind our M8 sits around a lot on display and only gets run on a very few occasions. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ford V8 engine number - ID? | Hanno Spoelstra | The Softskin Forum | 0 | 08-04-18 15:42 |
Ford contract number | Hendrik van Oorspronk | The Softskin Forum | 2 | 14-09-17 21:00 |
ford t16 chassis number tracing | Joe Bowen | The Carrier Forum | 6 | 03-11-16 12:37 |
Contract number for Ford F15A | Chris Daines | The Softskin Forum | 0 | 01-12-15 14:44 |
Ford engine number decoder | Keith Webb | The Softskin Forum | 5 | 24-05-07 17:54 |