MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-20, 02:34
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cliff View Post
As you guys know I do models. Keefy kindly measured the #9 Ford GT (Aust) fuel tank for me .........

Cheers
Cliff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Webb
All others are basically the same with the exception of the C60X which uses the same size 21 gall tanks as the gun tractors.
Digging up an old thread, but just for the record's sake, what are the dimensions of the GT/C60X 21gal tank please?

All others:
Length: 32 In.
Height: 10 in.
Width: 12In.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-20, 09:09
Harlé Sylvain's Avatar
Harlé Sylvain Harlé Sylvain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 254
Default

Hello

my ford fat cab 12 has this mesurements:

height: 25.5cm
large:30cm
long:82cm

I hope this will help you

Regards from Normandy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-20, 23:08
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Smith View Post
What are the dimensions of the GT/C60X 21gal tank please?

All others:
Length: 32 In.
Height: 10 in.
Width: 12In.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harlé Sylvain View Post
Hello

my ford fat cab 12 has this measurements:

height: 25.5cm
large: 30cm
long: 82cm

I hope this will help you

Regards from Normandy
Those are the sizes (32"/12"/10") of the standard 12 1/4 Gal tank. Does anyone have the dimensions of the 21 Gal tanks please?
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-20, 11:24
Alex van de Wetering Alex van de Wetering is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,767
Default

Tony,

I measured 1015mm x 345mm (height) x 305mm (depth) of a C60X tank

Alex
__________________
Chevrolet C8 cab 11 FFW
BSA Folding Bicycle
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-20, 11:48
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

In original dimensions, I read that as:

Length: 40 In.
Height: 13 1/2 In.
Width: 12 In.

Thank you, Alex.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!

Last edited by Tony Smith; 03-02-20 at 20:27.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-20, 12:14
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Regardless of my thoughts on Brexit (it seems a bit odd to be committing to something without knowing what you are comitting to, did the UK join the EU without knowing the terms?), I feel that since CMPs were designed in inches (and fractions?) in most cases it makes sense to discuss them in the units they were designed in. On the other hand, I feel vehicles designed in metric should normally be discussed in metric.


On second thought, perhaps the blind commitment to leave the EU isn't so odd, every few years we put an X on a ballot and trust that politicians (of many parties) will honestly represent us in a responsible fashion.... and unfortunately few of them do so once elected.

Last edited by Grant Bowker; 03-02-20 at 12:56.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-20, 20:27
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Bowker View Post
I feel that since CMPs were designed in inches (and fractions?) in most cases it makes sense to discuss them in the units they were designed in.
Exactly.

Excuse my Brexit comment, it was a good-natured poke at a topical subject. As I have explained in a couple of PMs I received on the matter, it was in no way meant to be a criticism or rejection of our European members.

We are custodians of historic vehicles, and the obligation is on us to try and keep that history as accurate as possible in preservation. I would hate to see some restorer in the year 2045 quote that "CMPs were an unusual combination of SAE, Whitworth and Metric systems".

I have worked on other projects that were designed using Imperial measurements, and while it totally did my head in trying to work out how many 2 13/64" boards went into a 6'7" panel, it worked out in the end because that was the system that it was designed to work with in the first place.

As Cliff started this thread with the intention of scaling parts for a model, I can fully understand the simplicity of the mathematics when working with Metric measurements to give dimensions for 1/35 or 1/43 models. It just makes thing easy.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016