MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-02-19, 23:39
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

Personally, I think stainless is a bit of an extravagance. Regular bundy line will outlast most of us.

I have been lucky in that I have found a couple of the kent-moore J8051 double flaring kits at surplus stores over the years. They would be very expensive to buy at retail, and do a fantastic job of brakelines and fuel lines. They were the standard in all the military shops when I was younger, but now with the metric lines, they have kind of fallen out of favour.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-02-19, 01:13
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

My thought on stainless was that, yes it does cost more but in the big scheme of the cost of restoring a complete vehicle I could live with the extra and the line would be unlikely to deteriorate either inward or outward (even if I wasn't as diligent as ideal about flushing the fluid to eliminate accumulated moisture). It does come down to personal choice, bundy, conifer, stainless - all have merits/advantages.
I think everyone has a favorite brake line flaring tool and a corresponding hated one. The tool I used on the stainless lines is sold by Eastwood and many others. I have never had it do an unusable or leaky flare. Call it luck, lack of operator skill with the other tools used... your choice. It is very much intended to be used clamped in a vice - not an on-vehicle tool although there are tools that use similar dies and should work on vehicle. I did think it extravagant to spend that much on a single purpose and rarely used tool but certainly appreciate the lack of aggravation doing a flare, discovering it is poor, cutting it off, redoing (maybe more than once), discovering the line is now too short to fit..... One observation about this style of tool compared to the "standard" bar clamp and screwdown flaring die is that it does require a bit more distance between the flare and the last bend in the line if the line is being bent before flaring.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Eastwood double flare tool 25304.jpg (33.7 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-02-19, 04:27
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,167
Default

Thanks all for the discussion and comments. I’m using the nickel copper line so it’s pretty flexible. I did pickup one of those brake flaring tools as pictured by Grant. I also picked up the straightening tool Eastwood sells. I have to say that it does a great job of taking the coiled line and making it very straight. The tool pictured, although pricey, to me it was worth it. It is very easy to use and does great flares with little effort.

As for my fuel line, I’m going to try and do a single piece for going to the back. I feel that the nickel copper line will be flexible enough to get it all in place.
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-02-19, 18:35
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,167
Default

Is this the correct route for the long line to the rear? Would the large holes in the cross members have the felt washers in them? Lastly would there be mounting clips along the way at a few of the bolt holes in the frame?
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-02-19, 19:07
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

I won't speak as to what ir original for the chev CMP, but common practice for brake lines (and fuel lines) is that they are clamped along the frame rails so there is no vibration of the line. There should be no need for grommets of any kind on the holes through the crossmembers, as a properly clamped tube should not be moving. It should be bent so it is not touching the edge of the hole of the crossmember.



Princess auto sells the wiring clamps with the rubber cushioning in them. In the military supply system they are called clamp loops, and come in a large variety of mounting hole sizes as well as the clamp size. They will be on sale starting on the 4th of March at Princess. They are prefect for securing the brake lines.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-02-19, 19:08
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

The route looks OK.
Yes, there would have been grommets (talk with Brian Asbury - he used to have them in felt, early ones may have been rubber).
Securing clips were used along the lines (and even if they hadn't been used originally I would put them on to ensure against vibration wearing through the line at any contact points you don't notice). Most surviving clips I've seen have been plain metal similar in shape to the photo.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CLP1048.jpg (148.6 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-02-19, 19:15
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,167
Default

Thanks guys for the comments. Headed back out to the shop
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-03-19, 04:36
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,167
Default

The long line to the rear went in just fine. I then got the ends marked up with a sharpiand then pulled the line out for putting the double flare. Thanks to the fact that the nickel copper line is very flexible things went well. Today I finished making up the rear lines. Everything went rather well and I’m quite pleased.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 2AFB0899-0214-4CE9-B09B-F2B18B409236.jpeg (134.1 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpeg AF6E127E-9E32-4194-ADA9-1B624A4684A6.jpeg (200.2 KB, 6 views)
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1944 C-15A-Wire-5 Restoration RichCam The Restoration Forum 706 18-05-23 02:43
Sold: 1944 Chev C15A Wire-3 Don Dingwall For Sale Or Wanted 11 02-04-15 23:26
What was once 2, is now 1. (C15A-Wire-5) RichCam The Softskin Forum 3 30-12-11 22:49
photos needed for c15a wire 3 van body jason meade The Softskin Forum 5 10-08-11 06:29
Wire loom for C15A Cab13 Jordan Baker The Restoration Forum 19 28-08-06 03:42


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016