MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old 10-09-18, 19:36
Davistine Liddle Davistine Liddle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Dehradun, India
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
I would say almost certainly for access. The original design is hopeless from a maintenance point of view (seems to be an art form for British vehicles).

The long nose was a vast improvement.
These where manufactured under General Motors.Even this truck is having a GM engine 216 or 235 ..

Restored truck
Attached Images
File Type: jpg BedfordFrt.jpg (1.07 MB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Bedford-rear.jpg (464.3 KB, 2 views)

Last edited by Davistine Liddle; 10-09-18 at 19:53.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Identification Required Neil Ashley The Armour Forum 15 13-01-20 10:11
Identification Required. Dave Mills The Sergeants' Mess 12 24-10-17 08:54
Identification Required. Dave Mills WW2 Military History & Equipment 1 27-04-17 20:32
Identification Required. Dave Mills The Armour Forum 14 02-04-17 06:10
ID Required Nigel Watson The Softskin Forum 3 31-03-05 16:44


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016