![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony,
I'm happy it arrived safely, That new postage service does save a few quid but following the tracking details certainly takes a bit of do'in ! ![]() Rob.................rnixartillery. Ah ps, the metal strips holding the webbing handles are correct and yes quite crude. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well, in that case I won't muck with them, Rob.
What about the use of wide head nails instead of screws, in some places. Is that something that was original too? I'm hoping not, but if so, I may need to rethink replacing them with screws.
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Rob...............rnixartillery. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is getting interesting. After I removed one of the timber lid strengthening pieces (heavily affected by wood rot & filled), and a large portion of the canvas cover, I made a discovery about what I thought were nails helping hold the brackets on. They aren't nails, that's for sure. There is a corresponding, but larger, flat section on the back of them. They must be original, because the canvas surely has never been off before, and these sit beneath that canvas layer. For some bizarre reason they must have chosen to use these in manufacture. Take a look for yourselves.
20161125_203002-resized-1024.jpg First photo is the top side of box lid, after canvas stripped back. You can clearly see five round metal surfaces. 20161125_203012-resized-1024.jpg 20161125_203018-resized-1024.jpg Those correspond to two in each lid hinge, and one at rear of the latch. What a lot of effort when screws would have done fine. Especially if the ones I've been trying to get out are anything to go by! Now I'm in a dilema. I cannot simply slap the hinges back down on the....whatever they are, and I don't want to obliterate them. Might have to sleep on that. 20161125_203045-resized-1024.jpg 20161125_203131-resized-1024.jpg Another curious component is the box corner braces. This too is an odd design. I guess they must have had good reason to stamp them with a raised portion to take countersunk screws, but damned if I know it. The simple brackets on my tool box would have been easier to make surely? The metal is noticably thinner on this box, so maybe the stamped (or perhaps embossed would be a better description) surface is to compensate for reduced overall bracket thickness, which would be too thin for rebate to take the countersunk screws!
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many of the British style chests use rivets for part of the retention of things like the rope handle blocks, hinges and hasps. In some cases, it was to prevent opening a locked box by simply removing some of the screws.
I would agree that the stamped corners would be to make them thicker for the use of the flat headed screws. It may have been a way to save metal. If you think about it, how many miles of metal strip twice the thickness would have been used otherwise to build crates. I have a large number of the bren chests here, and they simply used the heavier metal with countersunk holes for the corners. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That all adds up then, Rob.
My intention is to retain that rivet system, in appearance anyway. Because I've pulled the hinges over those rivets, to get them free, they won't serve their function, but I can still keep them looking right. I will shave a tiny bit more from the holes in hinges where those holes were attached with the rivet. Then they should go back together without force, and not look too far 'wrong'. 20161126_162138-resized-1024.jpg Yesterday I chose a new piece of timber to make a pair of stiffening braces for top of the lid. I believe it's some type of oak, possibly Tasmanian. Thickness is correct, but width will require cutting down. The orignal timber braces were not healthy. One far worse than the other, but if making one, might as well make both. The original/s will be filed away for referring to in any future need. The box and lid are now stripped back to either bare timber or initial thin coat of color. They have to dry well, before I do further work on them. Next stage is filling imperfections. I intend to try and save some original markings stamped on lower edge of both short sides. Should be easier to read once I sand there.....very lightly! I've ordered the three types of countersunk, slot head, wood screws that were originally used. The total cost, including shipping is $77.00AUD, but that is partly due to the 'job lots' of each being in excess of quantity I need for this particular project, and partly because they are coming from UK. They'll come in handy elsewhere, so I don't worry about $$$/£££ there. _20161127_214353.JPG Tonight, for want of something else to do, I made the template to cut the replacement canvas lid cover. I have heaps of the same canvas used on the tool box, so they will match. I will use same font for creating stencilling also. Didn't find any stencilling on this box. That's probably because it had 1,000 layers of badly applied paint, of several colors. 20161127_211917-resized-1024.jpg I'll post some photos of the box in it's bare state tomorrow evening.
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sorry about not posting the photos when I indicated I would. I've had an issue arise, that took priority.
20161204_101126-resized-1024.jpg The canvas lid cover did indeed get cut, and it's now been finished. The leather strap also in the photo, will go around the edge of the lid to secure the canvas. The manufacture of this box is quite different to the tool box I worked on some months ago. There is about a 1/2" gap between lid and box. This is because the thicker part of the hinges sit between the box & lid, instead of outside rear, as was the case with tool box. Therefore, 1/2" gap! Which I don't like, personally. Too bad, that's how it is, so I've gotta deal with it. Secondly, securing strap isn't recessed into the lid as far as tool box, making it tricky to make a satisfactory canvas cover. You will notice a rectangular hole in my canvas. That's to slip over the securing strap. The original wasn't like that, but if I copied that way 100% there would be an ugly gap in the lower 'skirt' of the canvas. Having already said there is the 1/2" gap, I didn't want to have any break in canvas to expose said gap. Hence the strap poking through my canvas. I think it looks OK. 20161204_102833-resized-1024.jpg The box took an awful lot of filling, to get rid of the cracks and surface blemishes. The large crack I had previously filled with wood glue, and had to remove a few millimetres depth of that to have sufficient purch for the filler. 20161204_115051-resized-1024.jpg It took several, increasingly shallower, applications of wood filler, before I was happy to proceed to the next step. 20161204_125353-resized-1024.jpg While waiting for the various layers of filler to harden, I straightened and blasted the brackets and locking latch. I found my bottle of gun blue, which I use for etching and darkening the steel parts, was considerably emptier than I had expected. As a result, I could only make a token effort with treating the brackets. I'll get more tomorrow, on my way to Nambour. 20161204_134853-resized-1024.jpg To be continued....
__________________
Ford CMP, 115" WB,1942 (Under Restoration...still) Medium sized, half fake, artillery piece project. (The 1/4 Pounder) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reel Info Needed | Barry Churcher | The Restoration Forum | 5 | 12-04-13 01:37 |
17 pounder anti-tank gun ammo box info | Kurtis Tsang | WW2 Military History & Equipment | 3 | 24-08-09 19:09 |
FWD more info needed | bria0789 | The Softskin Forum | 9 | 14-07-07 09:17 |
Need Info about the 2 Pounder Anti Tank Gun | Marco C. | The Restoration Forum | 0 | 27-09-06 12:48 |
fox info needed | Roger Condron | The Armour Forum | 31 | 19-10-05 22:33 |