MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Softskin Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old 04-04-16, 14:39
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

One source described part of the design philosophy for CMP trucks as being "use one size heavier than normal practice". I.E. use higher capacity (but still off the shelf) parts than might be expected for the carrying capacity of the truck to allow for the "abusive" loading and operation the Army subjected their trucks to. Other sources have described the Maple Leaf trucks as being "Heavy Duty Chevrolets made in Canada". I'm not saying these statements are 100% accurate but they might explain the disagreement seen in the posts above concerning component sizing.

On the topic of split rims - they can be perfectly safe if in good shape and treated with respect. Worn, rusted, mismatched (rim to ring) or otherwise abused wheels won't properly engage and may separate as they are being inflated. So yes, a cage or other restraint is very strongly suggested for safety. The real nasty split rims are the Firestone (and others?) RH-5 rims produced long ago that separated near the center of the rim (as opposed to at one side), have less bearing area along the joint and can't be visually inspected for engagement. A group of reference charts on servicing one piece and multi-piece rims can be found at http://www.kentool.com/index.php/new...safety-posters The content originates in the USA but should be basically the same worldwide.
This link from a rim manufacturer describes safe tire mounting processes http://www.accuridecorp.com/files/20...4-06-22-12.pdf It specifically describes treatment of multi piece rims. If these rims had been banned for safety reasons I strongly doubt that a manufacturer would want to get into the liability arena of describing how to use an outlawed product. The document has a 2012 copyright so isn't badly outdated - nothing like our beloved MB-C2 or MB-F1 that were published 70+ years ago. The publication also refers to a multi piece rim for tubeless applications. I hadn't realized they existed, thinking the joint in the rim would let air escape. Apparently the inner edge of the bead seals on the main part of the rim and the side/lock rings are narrow enough they don't interfere with the seal.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1940 Australian GMH Chevrolet military coupe utility Tim Hunter The Softskin Forum 26 12-04-25 15:11
1942 Australian 12 cwt Chevrolet Ute - Help! Ian McCallum The Softskin Forum 54 30-12-21 13:48
Chevrolet C60X in Australian service Keith Webb The Softskin Forum 13 11-08-20 12:24
Australian Chevrolet WO database Keith Webb The Softskin Forum 117 07-08-19 15:44
Australian Chevrolet 216 engine owners Lionelgee The Restoration Forum 22 17-10-09 05:32


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016