MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > Post-war Military Vehicles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-16, 15:25
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,159
Default

Doug:

That is a very long list! There are of course prototypes that became serial production models. As I scanned the list, several jumped out. The infantry APC, the recovery vehicles, the cargo carrier and the CP. It stands to reason that once the designers had a working platform, they would prototype other ideas for it. So if the mission was suited for an unarmoured 'carrier', then the M548 would have been the building block.

If you edited the list to group it by base vehicles, it would be more manageable.
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-16, 00:29
Douglas Greville's Avatar
Douglas Greville Douglas Greville is offline
Armour Owner x 3
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 177
Default

Terry

True.

I just copied and pasted it and threw it in here for interest sake. I did test it by thinking of a couple of obscure (but operational rather than concept) vehicles and they were in there.
Which is what made me think whoever put this list together, did their homework well.
Note that both Netherlands and Canadian Lynx are listed rather than just "Lynx".
Likewise the Aussie Saladin and Scorpion turreted variants of the M113A1.

I still think the idea of an M113 with a jet engine in it was a strange idea, can't see how that would have been a success?

Regards
Doug

Quote:
Originally Posted by maple_leaf_eh View Post
Doug:

That is a very long list! There are of course prototypes that became serial production models. As I scanned the list, several jumped out. The infantry APC, the recovery vehicles, the cargo carrier and the CP. It stands to reason that once the designers had a working platform, they would prototype other ideas for it. So if the mission was suited for an unarmoured 'carrier', then the M548 would have been the building block.

If you edited the list to group it by base vehicles, it would be more manageable.
__________________
dgrev@iinet.net.au
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-16, 01:06
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,930
Default

The list seems to have some double entries.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Greville View Post
Note that both Netherlands and Canadian Lynx are listed rather than just "Lynx".
Anyhow, the Dutch M113 C&R entry is incorrect, see my earlier posting.

Quote:
Luchs - M113 C&R in Netherlands service
The Luchs is a German 8x8 amphibious reconnaissance armoured fighting vehicle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-16, 01:16
Douglas Greville's Avatar
Douglas Greville Douglas Greville is offline
Armour Owner x 3
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 177
Default

Hanno

I think it is an English speaker mistake trying to translate "Lynx" into Dutch language and ending up with "Luchs" German language.

Correct terminology in Netherlands was M113 C&V as far as I know. Different sources seem to vary that around a bit.

Regards
Doug

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanno Spoelstra View Post
The list seems to have some double entries.
Anyhow, the Dutch M113 C&R entry is incorrect, see my earlier posting.
The Luchs is a German 8x8 amphibious reconnaissance armoured fighting vehicle.
__________________
dgrev@iinet.net.au
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-16, 01:34
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,731
Default 'Sources'

"Correct terminology in Netherlands was M113 C&V as far as I know. Different sources seem to vary that around a bit."

Sources, what 'sources' would those be? Wikipedia?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-16, 02:25
Douglas Greville's Avatar
Douglas Greville Douglas Greville is offline
Armour Owner x 3
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Storey View Post
"Correct terminology in Netherlands was M113 C&V as far as I know. Different sources seem to vary that around a bit."

Sources, what 'sources' would those be? Wikipedia?
You need to start getting out of the right side of the bed.

No.

Amersfoort.

Specifically "M113 C en V".

Regards
Doug
__________________
dgrev@iinet.net.au
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-01-16, 17:33
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,930
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Greville View Post
Correct terminology in Netherlands was M113 C&V as far as I know. Different sources seem to vary that around a bit.
Doug,

Indeed, that's what I said in post #23.

According to the technical manual the full nomenclature was
  • "Carrier, Commando en Verkenning M113A1 C&V. m/25 mm Boordwapen"
    which translates to
  • "Carrier, Command and Reconnaissance M113A1 C&R. w/25 mm mounted weapon"
HTH,
Hanno
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking For Manuals for CND LYNX M113 Steamynachos Post-war Military Vehicles 9 11-03-18 18:16
Restoration project - Canadian Scout Car Ford Lynx I Fabio.Morra The Restoration Forum 2 30-11-15 00:38
Lynx MK1 almost ready: lights needed DanJahn For Sale Or Wanted 6 19-05-09 20:29
M113 C&R Lynx Douglas Greville The Armour Forum 2 05-10-06 12:08
Wanted - M113 Lynx (C & R) manuals Douglas Greville For Sale Or Wanted 0 02-08-04 08:28


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016