MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-15, 20:22
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Kevin, further to that , I have one that is your style, and it too, is too big for the tray in the carrier. ( MkI*tray)
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-06-15, 11:51
kevin powles's Avatar
kevin powles kevin powles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
Kevin, further to that , I have one that is your style, and it too, is too big for the tray in the carrier. ( MkI*tray)
I will get an actual photo of mine and post up, another carrier mystery to be solved.
Kev.
__________________
2pdr Tank Hunter Universal Carrier 1942 registered 11/11/2008.
3" Mortar Universal Carrier 1943 registered 06/06/2009.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, Caunter camo.
1941 Standard Mk1 stowage Carrier, light stone.
10 cwt wartime mortar trailer.
1943 Mk2 Daimler Dingo.
1943 Willys MB.
1936 Vickers MG carrier No1 Mk1 CMM 985.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-15, 11:38
kosbie kosbie is offline
Rick Overy
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bunwell, Norfolk, England
Posts: 58
Default cooker for MkI

The MkII cooker does NOT fit the tray from the Mk I carrier. The original MkI cooker, as Kevin says, did not have the pull out drawer at the front with the petrol tank. The tank was loose in the box and was taken out and fitted before use. The basic Mk II box would fit the tray if it were not for two studs on the side and the drawer at the front which slightly increases its length – see the attached photos, which show a couple of Mk II cookers and an original tray TL13251. The second and third photos show the cooker (not) fitting in the tray. Presumably the MK 1 cooker box does not have the studs on the side, but I have never seen one – been looking for one for ages.
Rick
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cooker tray 1.jpg (60.2 KB, 243 views)
File Type: jpg cooker tray 2.jpg (56.6 KB, 241 views)
File Type: jpg cooker tray 3.jpg (71.4 KB, 243 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-17, 05:40
Jesse Browning Jesse Browning is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 366
Default

Has anyone solved this delima yet? I have the same problem with my Sexton. The operators manual says No. 2 stove. I have both Mk1 and Mk2 models of the No.2 stove. Neither fit. Jesse
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-17, 09:31
Ron Pier's Avatar
Ron Pier Ron Pier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Poole. UK
Posts: 1,273
Default

Since reading this thread, I've been doing some research and this is what I've found.
No2 MK1 was produced from the 30's - 1942
No2 MK2 was produced from 1942 – mid 70's
No2 MK2 Modified Mid 70’s -1992/3
No2 MK2 Modified upgrade (different burner and control) 70’s -1992/3

So I guess that my 1944 MK2 Carrier might well have had a No2 MK2 cooker, but so far I haven't looked into where or if one was stowed? Ron

Picture No2 MK1 Aldershot 1942
Attached Images
File Type: jpg No2 Mk1 aldershot-1942.jpg (62.4 KB, 11 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-17, 16:39
Jim Burrill Jim Burrill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hatfield, PA, USA
Posts: 430
Default

Is the box under the tins supposed to be the AFV Ration refill?

My knowledge on some details are weak... I thought the actual metal boxes for 2men 1 day , 3 men 1 Day, and 5 men 1day, stayed with the vehicle and were replenished from a throw-away cardboard box.

From a FaceBook page for WW1 and WW2 British Rations, a similar picture of a Compo box has white labels on tins without obvious labels, like the Bully beef or the salmon tins. This was discussed and the consensus was the bit of white space and "Peas" or "Soup" were added just for the photo to illustrate a point - ID to viewers of the photograph what the (unreadable) tin stenceling was.

I would think the odd labeling in this picture was from the same project.

WOuld love to see clear pictures of the restock cardboard box! I have been working on recreating the AFV and Compo rations to look correct, yet hide modern food. Safe for eating, match the right type and quantity of food as the wartime tins, and have a reusable material so you are not throwing away a 20 $$ label.

To that end, the best I have seen is a gold Mylar printing paper that you laser print the label on, then cut to fit the modern tin, and attach with some rubber cement. Use a can opener on the end without the pull tab, and eat the contents. Peel the label off after use (and the public has left). Then reattach after hitting the grocery market.

The Mylar paper would do two key thins - hide the modern tin ridges, and give it the gold color of the tins that have been shellacked. A third reason is to be able to reuse the things.

Anyone else interested in sharing notes and resources for such a project?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mk1 Carrier cooker tray kevin powles The Carrier Forum 12 16-02-12 21:49
CMP Carrier type Mirrors jeff davis For Sale Or Wanted 1 07-11-11 07:50
38 reasons to seal up stored engines Phil Waterman The Restoration Forum 12 28-04-10 02:37
Barn stored collection Rich Payne The Softskin Forum 1 27-06-07 00:43
Bren Gun Carrier/Carrier LP2A Steering Wheel on eBay Hanno Spoelstra For Sale Or Wanted 0 29-05-05 22:39


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016