Quote:
by Master R.
One aspect of this prohibits and quotes astreasonable any action by govt to forcibly remove any property or posessions that an individual may own. Since the Home Sec had just forced the removal of the legally held and correctly certified hand-guns, there was a case brought against him for treason citing the requirements of Magna Carta.
This they neatly side-stepped by casting off this
1215 legislation and Bill of Rights by claiming it was so old as to be inapplicable, forgetting for a moment that the specific subject matter may well be an emotive one, the official response is absolute Bollocks.
|
If the charge/complaint is filed WHILE a law/rule is still in effect, then even if the law/rule is done away with AFTER the charge/complaint is put forward, in my "logic" those charges/complaints are still valid and exist validly, and should be dealt with under the original understanding. Argh... but thats the beauty of changing the rules mid-stream isn't it? People walk away going "whew' THAT was close, laugh, and walk on undisturbed.
sigh
I still love my Canada. It's "home" ... so far.
30-08-04, 22:50
Threaded Mode