Mystery Lynx

Casey B · #1 24-12-11, 04:28

Yes sadly My nephew works at Columbia Remtec in Surrey and the truck with two of them stopped there to drop off aluminun Stock for their shop. Those are the ones heading to the Island to be scrapped as the truck driver said. they were driven on the truck flat low bed. Nephew has pics in his phone of them and they were out of Quebec...Yes the last two were pristine and had recent camo colours!
Thanks Mister Harper!

RHClarke · #2 24-12-11, 05:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey B

Yes sadly My nephew works at Columbia Remtec in Surrey and the truck with two of them stopped there to drop off aluminun Stock for their shop. Those are the ones heading to the Island to be scrapped as the truck driver said. they were driven on the truck flat low bed. Nephew has pics in his phone of them and they were out of Quebec...Yes the last two were pristine and had recent camo colours!
Thanks Mister Harper!

Being somewhat familiar with the military equipment acquisition and disposal programs, I have yet to hear of any PM in the past 12 years walking through military bases choosing what would stay and what would go. That is left up to the doctrine writers, environmental commanders and the program/project staffs. Budgetary constraints can and do lead to cuts to some programs, but better to axe the old (even though it still works - somewhat) than curtail the new.

Speaking as one of the Trudeau/Chretien era warriors, the present PM and his Cabinet deserve a pat on the back for kitting out our military with new kit that led to the successes experienced in Afghanistan. So I do agree with you (somewhat) - Thanks, Mr. Harper!

Marc Montgomery · #3 07-01-12, 15:56

it does seem such a shame however that "obsolete" Canadian mil vehicles these days will not end up in Canadian collectors hands for preservation.

The govt for example (a trend- not to blame any particular govt) is to be very worried about armour getting into private hands..remember how they freaked when the ferret went up onto the HILL. I have a photo of my 3-ton parked in front of centre block...drove right up took a pic...well that sure couldn't happen now.

It doesn't help with the recent (past decade or so) fearmongering over firearms with the spillover from so-called military "assault' rifles...by extension -anything-military in private hands is a tad suspect in the public's eyes.

It does seem a bit strange that we cant preserve examples of our own military history, but we can import and own stuff from the Soviet era...go figure..

I think owning an OT-65 would be kinda cool for example or a BRDM2..

jason meade · #4 07-01-12, 18:42

Marc...Just to let you know tha there are examples in collections, In the last 2 years i have picked up just about one example of everything armour related, with the exception of the leos and m-109, The 109 I will be working on when my leave is up, While i admit that private collectors will not have a chance at them unless they sorce them from another country...But as it stands right now I have 76 vechs in our collection, Most dating from the 50,s up to present day...Most are in class s condition when they have arrived in the last few years.
Jason

Dave Jackson · #5 29-01-12, 02:58

I can confirm that there are about 30 of them stacked three high in the scrap yard on Munns Road outside Victoria. Went there yesterday. I explained to the guy that I am restoring a military vehicle and wanted to look for parts. Was told this is not posible and anything that comes off them would have to be destroyed. I wasn't even allowed to go up and have a look.

I did look inside a couple of them when they were on a flat bed ouside Sidney. They were in good condition and very complete. Looked like they had not been used for a while but would not take much to get going. Anything loose inside had been removed so wasn't able to score any loose bits.

Casey B · #6 29-01-12, 03:34

Imagine the cost to ship then two at a time via latbed trucks all the way accross Canada from montreal to Victoria to scrap them.
Use a train system? Noooo wouldn't want them to beb seen all at once would we?
What pray tell did that cost the taxpayers and could not the cost of this be offset by selling some of the parts?

RHClarke · #7 29-01-12, 04:51

Do you think that the feelings of a few (and we are a rare lot in Canada) restorers outweighs the consequences of annoying our economically and militarily stronger neighbour, who by legislation (theirs mostly) owns the distribution and end user rights for the kit that is being destroyed? Hypothetically, the cost of not destroying them properly could be measured in sanctions that could affect our economy.

Yes, it is a shame that individuals are not permitted to play with these surplus armoured vehicles. However, our military heritage is being preserved through the Canadian War Museum. Hopefully they can squeeze a few more armoured and other vehicles into the bunker as they reach the end of their life cycles.

Now if you really want to pick a battle, do some research on the tendering process that led to the APCs being trucked all the way out to the west coast. That will probably be worth some ire.