MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-11-11, 20:59
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,167
Default

Ive enjoyed reading all what everyone has put into carriers over the years. The thing that I dont get is spending all the time and effort to adapt a new engine and transmission into something versus spending the time and money to rebuild what was already engineered to fit. When I look at some of the pictures with all the new mounts, linkages, fittings, ect ,ect, ect I think why not have spent that energy on what was originaly there.

My moto with any vehicle I have worked on is.... Since I have already spent X number of hrs on the vehicle, what's the problem with spending another hour or two getting it right.
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-11-11, 22:45
The Bedford Boys The Bedford Boys is offline
Steve Denby
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan Baker View Post
Ive enjoyed reading all what everyone has put into carriers over the years. The thing that I dont get is spending all the time and effort to adapt a new engine and transmission into something versus spending the time and money to rebuild what was already engineered to fit. When I look at some of the pictures with all the new mounts, linkages, fittings, ect ,ect, ect I think why not have spent that energy on what was originaly there.

My moto with any vehicle I have worked on is.... Since I have already spent X number of hrs on the vehicle, what's the problem with spending another hour or two getting it right.
It's not time, it's the $$$. Sure, if any of us had the ways and means of rebuilding the engine for the cost of a suitable replacement, we would all do it. But it comes down to $$$. When it comes down to it, the original engine can still be fitted should one find the cash to rebuild it. I am with you on the "getting it right" part, but sometimes you are torn between "getting it right" and getting in to debt, or in s**t with the mrs....
__________________
1967 Land Rover Plant Repair Vehicle
1941 Matchless G3L
194? Wiles Junior Trailer
1941 Morris Commercial CS8
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-11-11, 19:16
Hans Mulder Hans Mulder is offline
Frankencarrier owner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hope, B.C.
Posts: 309
Default

I don't wish to cast aspersions on those who have been doing this for many years, but us guys in our mid 20's don't have all the necessary tools, know how, equity, etc. built up yet. It makes doing the job perfectly somewhat more difficult. My goal is to get it looking enough like a carrier to keep on going for the next 15 years until I have the time, money, tools, facilities, and other resources to make it perfect.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-11-11, 20:41
ajmac's Avatar
ajmac ajmac is offline
Alastair McMurray
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 434
Default

The Loyd I have seen near me was fitted with a Fordson P6 diesel in the 60s, although the owner never saw it installed the previous farmer owner swore by the conversion said it made all the difference. In comparison the flathead V8 was gutless.
__________________
Alastair
Lincoln, UK.


Under Restoration:
1944 No2 MK2 Loyd Carrier - Tracked Towing
1944 Ford WOT6 Lorry


The Loyd on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-11-11, 21:11
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,167
Default

I guess what I was trying to say is why spend money on doing something only to spend more money down the road to redo your "custom" fit. That seems more expensive to me vrs going slower and within your means. This is all at the end of the day a hobby, I personally would never go into debt for it. As for us younger guys, I'm still in my 20's. I got my carrier at 22yrs, my car came at 24 yrs and I got a cell phone only 2.75 yrs ago due to work. It's all how you want to spend your money.
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-11-11, 04:28
D Ellery's Avatar
D Ellery D Ellery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Mangawhai, New Zealand
Posts: 64
Default

I hear what your saying Jordan. Mine was a simple decision at the time as I had all the parts to build a drive train and get the carrier rolling. The cost was so low that I have been able to fit out the vehicle for display. In my case if I had gone down the path of originality I would not have been able to drive , display and enjoy the vehicle as I have for the last few years as it would most probably still be in the shed. Apart from the engine she's all carrier. Cheers David.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg carrier at auckland war memorial museum 005.jpg (39.2 KB, 55 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-11-11, 12:52
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan Baker View Post
That seems more expensive to me vs going slower and within your means. This is all at the end of the day a hobby, I personally would never go into debt for it. It's all how you want to spend your money.
That would be precisely the reason for fitting a non-standard V8! The Ford Flathead is something of a enthusiast's engine, and finding an economical engine builder outside the American continent who knows their way around one is nearly impossible. As stated above, a Flathead/Sidevalve rebuild can cost upwards of $4000 this side of the equator.

2nd hand GM V8s (or Holdens) can be found reasonably easily and cheaply, and all the adapter work has been thought out long ago by Hotrodders of the past who wanted to fit newer, more powerful OHV V8s into older Ford chassies. Companies like Hurst, Offenhauser, Cragar and Edelbrock all made adapters to make it a simple bolt-in job, and some are still produced new today. They also regularly appear at swap meets. As David has said, it is a very economical way to get your vehicle moving while you get around to rebuilding that Ford V8 the right way. Down the track (pardon the pun!), when you finally do get the Flatty rebuilt, the GM engine and adapters will find a ready re-sale market, meaning you will virtually recoup your outlay.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Adapt SB Chev.jpg (10.7 KB, 43 views)
File Type: jpg Chev Front Mount.jpg (10.9 KB, 39 views)
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-11-11, 23:52
Stew Robertson Stew Robertson is offline
Staghound
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rockwood, ON, Canada
Posts: 268
Default

The flat head is one of the easiet engines to rebuils the biggest problem is finding good blocks that are not cracked between the valve seats and barrels
Your own home made tools will work for valve removal and for less the a grand you can have all the parts- Oversize piston, crank regind, cam and gaskets your only other cost is clening the block and magna flux
I just finished a 100 hjp merc engine without labour I head 1047.00 in it
Then I had to put the starter on and rebuilding the Generator
I would rather rebuild an old flatty any day compared to a six banger Chuv
Stew
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016