![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From what I have read (once again from untested articles) the Mosquito was the first choice for the raid but size of the weapon made it all too difficult. I think the shots in the original movie of the Mosquito were of scaled down "proof of concept" experiments. There were many, many more experiments and tests carried out than the dramatised version shown in the original movie or mentioned in the book.
The Americans became very good at skip bombing from B25 Mitchells in the Pacific on anti-shipping attacks. They used standard 250lb and 500lb bombs and dropped from 50-100 feet. There are many photos and movies of them making successful attacks on Japanese shipping. Of course this would not have worked on the dams which required underwater explosions. As a comment I think the back-spin was totally to do with stabilizing the weapon during flight and bouncing. The "crawl up to the wall" theory would not work as it was spinning in a direction to take it back, not forward, once it hit the wall or bottom. Last edited by Lang; 16-11-11 at 22:24. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Originally yes, in practice no. the following excerpt is from:
http://www.outermarker.co.uk/Article...h/chastise.htm "The bombs were to be spun by the addition of a Ford V8 engine but this changed such that the hydraulic supply, which normally powered the mid-mounted gun turret that had been removed as part of a weight saving exercise, was used to power a hydraulic motor." I always assumed it was generated by wind from the airspeed of the aircraft. Wrong again.. Rich.
__________________
C60S Austin Champ x 2 Humber 1 Ton & Trailer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All
The NOVA PBS program on the Canadian recreation is being aired at this time in the US. Here is a link which I hope will work outside the US. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/militar...tler-dams.html very interesting program. Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman `41 C60L Pattern 12 `42 C60S Radio Pattern 13 `45 HUP http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/ New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com |
![]() |
|
|