|
|
|
|
#1
13-04-11, 11:49
|
|||
|
|||
i've never been in a valentine but i'm working on it. i don't think they built them for comfort or even speed for that matter
 but i still like it, it looks well proportioned and relatively modern looking when compared to it's contemparies ie- matilda 1,2 and churchill. i was reading a book not long ago which described 2x6pdr vals stalking and killing a tiger in the tall grass of the russian steps. not bad for a little tankeddy
__________________
_______________________ 1941 mk1 mortar Carrier 1941 Mk1* Carrier 1942 Mk1* Carrier 1943 T16 Carrier 1945 Mk3 Dingo 1941 Mk3 Covenanter 1941 Mk4 Churchill AVRE (now sold) 1944 Mk6 Cromwell (now sold) 1952 Mk3 Centurion 1952 ARV Centurion 1952 ARV Centurion 1953 Mk3 Centurion (breaking) 
|
|
#2
13-04-11, 13:34
|
|||
|
|||
|
A Valentine
is an infantry tank, built to travel with soldiers on foot. So, not fast.
I agree Eddie, not a bad looking tank for that time. I fitted in them no trouble at all...when I was 10.
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions....
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
