![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Visit http://home.cogeco.ca/~gdavidson1/home.html for examples - look at 1st Cdn Inf Div, AoS 47 and then the same for the 2nd and 3rd Cdn Inf Divs. Three separate units with the same AoS sign. Modern tac signs are less "flashy" but easier to comprehend - you don't have to remember colours or colour patterns...
__________________
RHC Why is it that when you have the $$, you don't have the time, and when you have the time you don't have the $$? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The Arm of Service marking, in this case '73' on a horizontally divided red over blue background, was meant to be read in conjunction with the formation sign carried by the vehicle. In the two Canadian armoured divisions the AoS number ‘73' was used to identify the divisional LAA regiment, while in the three Canadian infantry divisions the AoS number ‘47' was used to identify the divisional LAA regiment. Both ‘Corps Troops’ LAA regiments of I and II Canadian Corps used the AoS number ‘14' with a 2-inch white bar above the Arm of Service marking, denoting Corps Troops. Cheers
__________________
Mark |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Mark |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Consider it added value, and you also included info on the "white bar".
__________________
RHC Why is it that when you have the $$, you don't have the time, and when you have the time you don't have the $$? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you both Gentlemen.
As you say, Army Eh! Rob
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Archive of 10th(R/Fus)Medium Regt RA. Son of a Gunner who was the Son of a Gunner |
![]() |
|
|