![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice period pic from Life showing various tyre treads and sizes:
A stack of huge earthmover and combat vehicle tires showing deep treads.
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Hanno,
Nice article, the British actually marked their Chevron pattern tyres with an arrow, to show the direction of rotation. This shows the open end of the V striking the ground first, which is completely opposite to the way the Canadians show it in their manuals. Having stated that, driving my Chev with the open end of the V striking the ground first, makes it slightly easier to handled, than with the closed end hitting the ground first. I was told years ago, that the reason for mounting the tyres with the V striking the ground first, was that if you became stuck, you could always back out of trouble, which is hardly going to affect us on todays roads ! Regards Keith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The size of the tyre, 900x16, is a tyre that fits a 16 inch rim. The tyre having a 9 inch high side wall, which gives an overall nominal diameter of 9+16+9=34 inches. or in the case of a 10.50 x 16, 10.5+16+10.5= a nominal diameter of 37 inches.
I write this because I believe the article is misleading.
__________________
Bluebell Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991 Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6. Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6 Jeep Mb #135668 So many questions.... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lynne,
I will go with Hanno and agree that the numbers refer to the section width not the height of the sidewall. Verification of this can be found on numerous tyre manufacturers sites. In the early days they used to describe the tyres as "Standard" or "Balloon" to describe tall skinny ones compared to fat round ones and they often only gave the overall height not width so you only knew they were fat or skinny by the word description. Of course that problem has now been solved by modern tyre descriptions giving the width, height (expressed as a percentage of width) and wheel diameter eg 205 X 75 X R16 Which equates to 205mm wide by 75% of that high (about 150mm), R for radial and 16 inch wheel. Nothing like mixing up Imperial and Metric measurements to help everything. Lang |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Keith, Most of the original directional tyres I have seen actually had two arrows, "Driving" and "Rolling" I have a 1944 Australian Army TM (which is just a reprint of a US Army TM with a different cover) on "Care and Maintenance of Rubber Tires". It says all tires should be fitted with open side of "V" striking the road for vehicles used on formed surfaces. Up to 20% greater life can be expected. For vehicles used off road the rear driving wheels should be fitted with the point of the "V" striking the road. A considerable increase in traction on soft surfaces has been demonstrated by this fitment. Only wheeled armoured vehicles should have all wheels with the point of the "V" striking first at all times. Lang |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No, Im not asking tyres out on dates...
On today's tyres.. among other sidewall markings you'll see a date code .. typically 4 numbers like for example: [1307] this number = the tyre was manufactured during the 13th week of 2007 . I checked my MRF 900 - 13's, and they are dated 2002 . I also have a few OLYMPIC 900-13's dated the year 2000 . Recently, there has been a few cases of tyre retailers selling tyres which are way past the 'use by' date ... Apparently, more than 6 years old , is considered to be a non-roadworthy tyre here - they reckon the compound dries out .. leaving it prone to disintegrating under high speed. Mike
__________________
1940 cab 11 C8 1940 Morris-Commercial PU 1941 Morris-Commercial CS8 1940 Chev. 15cwt GS Van ( Aust.) 1942-45 Jeep salad |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Morris or 8cwt blitz at high speed?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found another manual "Maintenance and Care of Pneumatic Tires and Rubber Treads" TM31-200 April 1, 1943
Quite thick and has vehicle and aircraft tyres, half-track treads and tank tracks including detailed repair and fitting instructions. Big charts of tire pressures for each size and vehicle type etc. Lang |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been reading "Design Record Canadian-Developed Military Vehicles World War II". This is a summary of the experiences and design decisions made during the CMP program. It is in 8 volumes and in volume 4 tyre production, size choices and wear considerations are discussed.
Firstly the loss of the major rubber producing areas is discussed. This was a serious enough situation for a number of hitherto rubber parts (including the windscreen blocks on the Jeep and motor bike twist grips) to be made of alternative materials. It may be that the transition from rubber boots round the levers in the CMP cab changed from rubber to canvass at this time for the same reason. Then the topic of which way round to mount the tyres is introduced. Though specific instructions were issued one is left with the feeling that they were not strictly adhered to. Alastair F60S |
![]() |
|
|