MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > 'B' ECHELON > The Sergeants' Mess

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-07-13, 03:41
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,152
Default

All good and distinctive news. As for the ranks, Warrants Officers have worn crowns since Unification 'unified' the rank badges across the CAF. If Army majors reverts to old fashioned ranks, who will be saluting who?

The names for trained soldiers have been used forever, although maybe just informally.

By numbering the areas, there is bound to be even greater confusion.
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-13, 12:43
Wayne McGee Wayne McGee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Truro, N.S. Canada
Posts: 127
Default Maj/WO

Easy peazy, Major's are the ones with swagger sticks being followed closely by Pte Baldrick.

Cheers
__________________
.50 Cal Ammo Can
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-07-13, 15:02
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

That, and the haircuts should give it away.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-07-13, 16:29
45jim 45jim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Woodstock, ON
Posts: 154
Default Non-commissioned members

They need to dump this stupid "members" phrase as well. No one calls them "NCM's" it always "NCO's". When they brought it out I thought I was being offered a membership in the Moose Lodge.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-13, 16:42
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

When writing PERs, my Captain would not allow us to use the term "member" in the PER, because it made him think of a penis. So instead we had to use "Cpl Bloggins" and "he" repeatedly throughout the evaluation narrative.

All of these changes are in order to wipe out the legacy of the liberal party of Canada, and even a higher up Liberal was complaining about it in the news yesterday. The idea of having a politically correct and environmentally friendly army is a bit of an oxymoron.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-07-13, 12:39
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob love View Post
When writing PERs, my Captain would not allow us to use the term "member" in the PER, because it made him think of a penis. So instead we had to use "Cpl Bloggins" and "he" repeatedly throughout the evaluation narrative.

All of these changes are in order to wipe out the legacy of the liberal party of Canada, and even a higher up Liberal was complaining about it in the news yesterday. The idea of having a politically correct and environmentally friendly army is a bit of an oxymoron.
I heard that. The Liberal defence critic said this had to do with wiping out the Liberal brand from the Armed Forces. What a hypocrite. As if Liberal unification, gas station attendant uniforms, wonky rank structures and removal of all things 'Royal' wasn't an attempt remove traditional symbols and re-brand things themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-07-13, 19:09
Hans Mulder Hans Mulder is offline
Frankencarrier owner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hope, B.C.
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
As for the ranks, Warrants Officers have worn crowns since Unification 'unified' the rank badges across the CAF. If Army majors reverts to old fashioned ranks, who will be saluting who?
Small crown = Major = Salute

Large crown = WO = No salute
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-07-13, 19:22
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default

As this only applies to Orders of Dress other than DEW the discussion included the use of a horizontal line below the Major's Crown (similar to an Officer Cadet's current rank badge) to identify the Major from the WO. This was mostly to assist foreign soldiers who would not be familiar enough with the different sizes of Crowns. The other option was to just not do anything.
C
__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-07-13, 20:23
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default Rank

There is a lot of discussion in the media on this with many of the 'unwashed masses' complaining of the costs. This is understandable as the Minister's announcement put the accent on a return to heritage rank symbols.
Insofar as the Army was concerned, this was a pleasant, and welcome, by-product but the focus was on two items;
1. Inter-operability with Allied nations. Most countries with which Canada is aligned wear rank symbols where three identical devices identify a Captain and a single (different) device identifies a Major. Anyone who has done a UN tour will have noted that Egypt, Jordan, Croatia, and many others, as well as all of the Commonwealth countries, follow this practice. Canadian Army officers have attended international meetings in the field and have been asked both their rank and "why is the Navy here?" due to the existing rank stripes. In fact, of our major Allies only the US and France do not follow this system.
2. Cost. Every new officer and every promoted officer incurred tailoring costs to DND. The tailor was required to open the seam, unstitch the lining, remove the rank, sew on new rank, stitch the lining and re-sew the seam. An estimnated cost of $27.00 per uniform. Additionally, every officer incurred private costs for Mess Dress. Compare to pinning on a new star or crown at a cost of under $1.00. Further, the current rank symbols require every base tailor to stock separate rolls of every rank from O/Cdt to Col and almost 40cm are used per uniform. Compare to two boxes, one containing stars, another crowns.

Clive
__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-07-13, 22:08
RHClarke's Avatar
RHClarke RHClarke is offline
Mr. HUP
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ottawa Area
Posts: 2,327
Default Pip! Pip!

I am sorry that I won't be in uniform to see this change take place. It is a good move that aligns the Canadian army with our hard fought military heritage. Some may say it is too "British", but the majority will not have such reservations. This is just another move that will serve to undo the damage done by the Liberals to one of Canada's most important institutions.

Next step: Reinstate the Airborne Regiment!
__________________
RHC
Why is it that when you have the $$, you don't have the time, and when you have the time you don't have the $$?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-07-13, 22:35
servicepub (RIP)'s Avatar
servicepub (RIP) servicepub (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hans Mulder View Post
Small crown = Major = Salute

Large crown = WO = No salute
optionally;

Major - Don't salute, get shit.
Warrant Officer - Salute, get shit.
__________________
Those who live by the sword will be shot by those of us who have progressed.
- M38A1, 67-07800, ex LETE
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-07-13, 04:43
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,675
Default

A hundred years ago we had a Canadian Survey Corps Major on exchange on a job in Papua New Guinea. The Canadians had not long changed to combined forces or whatever it was called.

Apart from the Australian soldiers treating him like an Air Force officer ie ignoring him because of his stripes, he was openly depressed that politicians and their politically correct advisors were allowed to destroy a heritage going back to before the Romans.

The separation of land, sea and later air, elements recognised their unique areas of expertise along with specialised skill and training.

The bleeding hearts can not come to grips with the fact an army is purely and simply a killing machine. No matter how you dress it up with parades, rescues in flood/fire/famine or "peace keeping", the only reason for spending an obscene amount of money on an army is in the hope we can kill more of them than they kill of us before our country is occupied or destroyed in times of absolute national threat.

A big part of this is tradition and many is the time a smaller or lesser equipped force with greater belief in themselves has defeated a superior enemy purely through morale. Having everyone in the same school uniform using contrived names, ranks and job descriptions seriously damages the backs-to-the-wall motivation of the entire force.

Great move Canada to finally see some sense!

Lang

Last edited by Lang; 10-07-13 at 05:54.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-07-13, 14:08
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael R. View Post
[I] ...
We should get a move on to have those 115,000 or so active "member's" uniforms changed up, and supplies stocked into "the system". Will it be just in time to change the whole dang lot to a King's crown?
The Windsor crown is with us for a while. I have no idea where or how I remember this factoid, but Prince William apparently has no interest in changing the crowns. They are too deeply ingrained across the Commonwealth to change easily. (While HRH Queen Elizabeth II had to change when she stepped up is beyond my pay grade.)
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-07-13, 20:03
Hans Mulder Hans Mulder is offline
Frankencarrier owner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hope, B.C.
Posts: 309
Default

Any word on the implementation timeline?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-07-13, 21:33
Alex Blair (RIP) Alex Blair (RIP) is offline
"Mr. Manual", sadly no longer with us
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa ,Canada
Posts: 2,916
Default R.c.a.f.

Well all us blue guys ,if we revert back to our pre Hellyard ,as Warrant officers ,we now become Flight Sergeants..
Yea..Bring it on!!
Canadian politicians are not and never have been interested in defence," he wrote, adding "the Canadian public cannot escape a share of the blame. Too many of our people think that all we enjoy was always there, was not fought for, will just continue, without our personal attention. We are no longer pulling our weight in international affairs. While some reasonable degree of freedom still remains for us under our form of government, we must face the fact that this freedom will soon disappear unless we exercise our rights wisely. We must take greater pains to ensure that we are well enough informed to choose wise leaders - perhaps, great leaders.
Jeff Brock
Rear Admiral
http://www.navalandmilitarymuseum.or...ification.html
__________________
Alex Blair
:remember :support :drunk:
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dodge wc in Canadian Army? Kenny Desaever The Softskin Forum 27 15-08-21 10:16
4th Canadian Armored Div Signals. (4th Canadian Army Overseas - 9th Light Aid Detachm chris vowles WW2 Military History & Equipment 4 11-02-10 00:14
From the Canadian to the British Army PPS Your Relatives 0 11-05-08 21:30


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016