MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 26-11-22, 02:19
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,680
Default

Mike

That was my point.

There was LL and Reverse LL. If as you say the balance was 75/25 how did Australia finish up so close the square? Certainly more at play with this treaty then raw LL/RLL figures.

Lang
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Australia and Lend-Lease Mike K WW2 Military History & Equipment 21 16-09-17 17:40
Lend Lease Records David Dunlop WW2 Military History & Equipment 5 17-10-14 23:51
Lend Lease Chev 1 1.5 ton Chevrolet 41 The Restoration Forum 29 12-09-13 13:33
Lend Lease Decal Barry Churcher The Sergeants' Mess 9 18-09-12 13:24
Lend Lease 105 mm howitzers bram risseeuw The Gun Park 0 28-10-07 15:19


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016