MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > The Wireless Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-05-16, 00:36
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default Wireless of the Week - week 15

At the beginning of the First World War the British began wondering who the spy was. Every time they planned something the Hun (I say ‘Hun’ with all due respect to our German friends) was there waiting for them. It was soon clear, however, that the ‘spy’ was the lowly signaler communicating his signals from trench to trench over his field phone and, through no fault on his part, offering up the same message to the Germans by way of their sensitive interception equipment.

Field phones operating with morse code send their dots and dashes as electric pulses over wires: current for a dot or dash, no current for the space between them. It was this electric on/off that was being picked up. Captain Fuller, a British Signals officer came up with a device to beat the Germans. What if you sent a signal for your dot and dash, but then put a similar current on the line for the silent space between them? To another sensitive Fullerphone, the distinction was heard and the signal received. The eavesdropper got a continuous current in the line and therefore had no idea what was being communicated. Further frustrating the Hun (again apologies, but it does fit the narrative) was the very low amperage required for signals between sets.

The continuous current in the line while still sending a morse signal was accomplished with a ‘buzzer chopper’ that sent a current over the line while also providing current to a series of condensers. When the circuit was broken, the condensers released their current into the line at much the same voltage as that of the morse dot or dash.

Beyond the clandestine use of Fullerphones, the different nature of their signals also allowed them to operate on the same line as a regular field phone without any interference with the field phone operation. This meant one line could be used for two or more communication devices saving effort, time, material…and lives. Range of a Fullerphone is only limited by leakage and resistance in the line however under field service conditions the range called for would not normally exceed 15 to 20 miles.

This Fullerphone is a Canadian made Mk.IV example built by Northern Electric in 1941. It is stored in a wooden box 12” by 6-7/8” by 7” with a web carrying strap and provision for a grounding spike. The complete unit weighs 14 pounds. A set of earphones is held on the lid by metal clips when not in use and the lid also has a metal plate with operating instructions. The set is removed from the box by depressing a metal tab and sliding it forward. It is a metal alloy case that has provision for two X cell batteries, terminal posts for the line connections, a potentiometer dial (to reduce interference from stray earth voltages), plugs for the headset and a built in morse key. The ‘buzzer chopper’ is a removable component on the top right and has controls with locks to the set buzzer and tone in the earphones.

The manual has several diagrams showing how Fullerphones could be used in pairs or in complex multiple configurations alongside regular field phones and connected to exchange switchboards.

Hopefully now when someone calls a field phone a Fullerphone you can set them straight.
Attached Thumbnails
1.jpg   2.jpg   3.jpg   4.jpg   5.jpg  

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-05-16, 01:28
Chris Suslowicz Chris Suslowicz is offline
Junior Password Gnome
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: England
Posts: 814
Default

Er, not quite...

Most signalling was done using buzzer morse, and the interception was simply a sensitive valve amplifier with the input connected to a couple of earth pins suitably spaced apart. This picked up the AC buzzer signal for a considerable distance and standard telephony was not safe either. The "danger zone" was somewhere between 3000 and 5000 yards deep.

The Fullerphone is a DC telegraph working on a very low voltage (1.5 volts from a single 'S' or 'X' cell) and it has filtering (inductors and capacitors) between the key and the output terminals. This smooths the transitions so there is no AC component for the enemy to detect. At the receiving end, the incoming (tiny) signal is converted to AC by the chopper and fed to the headphones. It really does work on tiny voltages and currents and is pretty much undetectable. The potentiometer is fitted so you can cancel out any stray voltage due to soil conditions (electrolysis of metals in the ground) and reduce any background interference. Only really a problem with earth return circuits, and they were switching to copper pairs wherever possible - again to defeat the interceptors (who could still get pickup due to leaky insulation on cables in shell holes, etc.).

Louis Meulstee has a nice page (well, lots of excellent pages really) on the Fullerphone as well as the usual radio topics. http://www.wftw.nl/ful.html



Chris.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-05-16, 02:07
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default

Er, quite enough for people who want the basics (my target here) without being electronic whizzes....though your description is more accurate and will no doubt assist those wanting to fully understand the inner workings of a Fullerphone!! Thanks again Chris for your input.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Suslowicz View Post
Er, not quite...

Most signalling was done using buzzer morse, and the interception was simply a sensitive valve amplifier with the input connected to a couple of earth pins suitably spaced apart. This picked up the AC buzzer signal for a considerable distance and standard telephony was not safe either. The "danger zone" was somewhere between 3000 and 5000 yards deep.

The Fullerphone is a DC telegraph working on a very low voltage (1.5 volts from a single 'S' or 'X' cell) and it has filtering (inductors and capacitors) between the key and the output terminals. This smooths the transitions so there is no AC component for the enemy to detect. At the receiving end, the incoming (tiny) signal is converted to AC by the chopper and fed to the headphones. It really does work on tiny voltages and currents and is pretty much undetectable. The potentiometer is fitted so you can cancel out any stray voltage due to soil conditions (electrolysis of metals in the ground) and reduce any background interference. Only really a problem with earth return circuits, and they were switching to copper pairs wherever possible - again to defeat the interceptors (who could still get pickup due to leaky insulation on cables in shell holes, etc.).

Louis Meulstee has a nice page (well, lots of excellent pages really) on the Fullerphone as well as the usual radio topics. http://www.wftw.nl/ful.html



Chris.

Last edited by Bruce Parker (RIP); 27-05-16 at 02:23.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-05-16, 08:06
Bruce MacMillan Bruce MacMillan is offline
a Canuck/Brit in Blighty
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hell Fire Corner, Kent UK
Posts: 697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Parker View Post
Er, quite enough for people who want the basics (my target here) without being electronic whizzes....
Especially with an audience of pongos, zipperheads & dropshorts...

The Fullerphone was not without faults. Here's an extract from a 1919 report by Lieut. W Arthur Steel, 4th Canadian Div. Sigs.

"In February 1918 another interesting fact was brought to light through a listening post. It was discovered that under certain conditions fullerphone messages could be picked up by amplifier sets. This was fully investigated and it was found that if one of the instruments in a circuit was faulty then all instruments, whether good or bad, could be picked up by the amplifier. All the instruments from an affected circuit were returned for testing. One type F and one type D were found to be defective when on the send-receive position.

On the type F set it was found the lead from the common side of the condenser to the right contact point of the send-receive switch was broken, leaving the circuit open. The type D set also had a similar issue with this part of the circuit. The solution was to check and test all sets before deployment."

The monitoring of communications by our own security people wasn't popular but necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-05-16, 04:16
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C Joe C is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 43
Default Capt Steel's Wireless Report

Capt Steel's full report is available on RCSigs.ca. The first part is already transcribed, the rest is being worked on. For now, the entire report is also available in pdf format. Enjoy!

http://www.rcsigs.ca/index.php/Wirel...Canadian_Corps

I have also posted an interesting report on the type of conversations being picked up by the IT sets. The above report has the following incident:
Quote:
Some 5.9’s were dropping near a heavy Trench Mortar Battery and the operator on the IT set, overheard the F.O.O. call up the Bombardier in charge and ask whether damage was being done. The Bombardier replied “No, they are falling about 150 towards to our left, Sir”. Although the Hun had been pounding away for over an hour, it only took him fifteen minutes to switch and put the Mortar out of action, incidentally killing the Bombardier and all but one of the crew. This statement is vouched for, as the battery was not more than 200 yards from the IT Post.
Other conversations are in a report from 1917. http://www.rcsigs.ca/index.php/Repor..._6_August_1917
__________________
Joe C
www.RCSigs.ca

Last edited by Joe C; 28-05-16 at 04:21. Reason: Added second report.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-07-16, 23:49
Bruce Parker (RIP) Bruce Parker (RIP) is offline
GM Fox I
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,606
Default

Updating with Fullerphone manual.
Attached Thumbnails
Manual.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-11-19, 21:55
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C Joe C is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 43
Default

Finally acquired my own example. This one is a near mint (the unit and case interior, unfortunately not the outside of the case) Northern Electric Mk IV* serial number C-1739 manufactured in 1943. More photos at: RCSigs.ca - Fullerphone Mk IV (Canadian)

Now for my questions.....

The plug on my headset has a 'fat' connector while others seem to have a slim connector. Any significance to that?

Meulstee says there were 14,000 Canadian Mk IV and Mk IV* units made in 1942/43 but I've never seen a serial number that high. Bruce's example (original post) is a nice early example from 1941, serial C-329 and appears to be a Mk IV. Mine is a Mk IV*, 1943, serial C-1739. When did they switch from Mk IV to Mk IV*? Did they restart the serial numbers with the Mk IV*s?

Meulstee also says that early models had a Canadian Key W.T. 8 Amp No. C2 but that later units were fitted with Canadian Key W.T. 8 Amp No. C3. Based on my example having a C2, it looks like the change over was with the Mk IV*. Does anyone know at (or about) what serial number the change over happened? Are there known examples of Mk IV with a Canadian W.T. 8 Amp No. C3?
Attached Thumbnails
IMG_6467 web2.jpg   IMG_6464 web2.jpg  
__________________
Joe C
www.RCSigs.ca

Last edited by Joe C; 19-11-19 at 22:06. Reason: qualified statemet on condition; added photo of case
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wireless of the Week - week 6 Bruce Parker (RIP) The Wireless Forum 11 21-08-16 14:30
Wireless of the Week - week 7 Bruce Parker (RIP) The Wireless Forum 3 16-07-16 23:47
Wireless of the Week - week 8 Bruce Parker (RIP) The Wireless Forum 5 09-04-16 23:24
Wireless of the Week - week 3 Bruce Parker (RIP) The Wireless Forum 11 07-03-16 01:16
Wireless of the Week - week 2 Bruce Parker (RIP) The Wireless Forum 5 28-02-16 15:54


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 16:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016