MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-14, 18:05
John A. Rippingham John A. Rippingham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Stockport
Posts: 149
Default Carrier sold at Congleton cattle market

Hello,

An elderley MV enthusiast who i visit regularly passed these pictures on to me. He has been into military vehicles all his life and was a young lad during the war, so has many stories which are great to listen to. I took him to see my carrier and he told us about a carrier selling at the congleton cattle market in the mid fifties, saying didn't have any way of getting it home, and he'd alway regretted not buying it. He did say he had pictures of it somewhere, and sure enough on my next visit he had found them. Looks like a mk2 to me but i'm no expert.

Click image for larger version

Name:	roys carrier.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	69775 Click image for larger version

Name:	roys carrier 2.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	46.0 KB
ID:	69776
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-12-14, 03:00
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,159
Default Converted MK-I in MMG stowage

Interesting British carrier. Based on the limited detail available in the two images: a MK-I modified to a MK-II in MMG stowage? Or simply an early production (transition model) MK-II (as John observed) in MMG stowage. It is not a converted/modified/upgraded MK-I* or production MK-II*.

The hull extension plate base addition suggesting the in-service date and anticipated landing role. MK-I Lucas headlamps. Glacis plate MMG tool stowage, with existing tool plate brackets less tow cable retained. 2" mortar bracket bolt holes in the one piece gunner left front protection plate. Divisional wall wireless cable openings. Open tube sections of firing rests. MK-I kit locker relocated to rear upper protection plate. MMG stowage spider brackets on rear upper protection plate. No provision for BREN tripod, MK-I rear fenders.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-12-14, 09:13
John A. Rippingham John A. Rippingham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Stockport
Posts: 149
Default

Hello Micheal,

Thank you, for taking the time to reply. My friend will enjoy very much finding out what he could of had. He's 78 now so the vehicles he has seen go to the scrap is criminal. He does have another picture of it, which he will find in due course.

With my limited knowledge for carriers, interpreting what you have said, this is a MK2 british mortor carrier with MK1 rear fenders and headlights. Would a MK2 have the stacey towing attachement?

I was the headlamps that threw me, but looking at them again, they do look much further forward than where they are on mine?

I guess this could be the work of reme after the war? using the parts they had to make complete vehicles?

Thanks again for your help.

John

Last edited by John A. Rippingham; 13-12-14 at 09:22.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-12-14, 09:58
RichardT10829's Avatar
RichardT10829 RichardT10829 is offline
Richard Harrison
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cullercoats Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom
Posts: 3,059
Default

Lamps look about right to me position wise.

I thought the rear fenders were an after war fabrication as they looked incorrect... Thrown off as the gunners side has been crushed a bit but agree with Michael R as being mk1
__________________
is mos redintegro

__5th Div___46th Div__
1942 Ford Universal Carrier No.3 MkI*
Lower Hull No. 10131
War Department CT54508 (SOLD)
1944 Ford Universal Carrier MkII* (under restoration).
1944 Morris C8 radio body (under restoration).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-12-14, 12:30
John A. Rippingham John A. Rippingham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Stockport
Posts: 149
Default

I'm pretty sure on mine the head lamps are on the track guards, the head lamps in the picture look to be on the fenders.

Click image for larger version

Name:	100_2965.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	124.6 KB
ID:	69796 Click image for larger version

Name:	100_2974.jpg
Views:	9
Size:	122.4 KB
ID:	69797
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-12-14, 15:56
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,159
Default

Yes, the headlamps on the prototype, and upgrade model would be set forward to accommodate the installation of the POL supports. See Nigel Watson, Universal Carriers, Volume II for an image and description of a similar headlamp setup.

I agree with you, Richie, about the rear fenders being non-standard.

Last edited by Michael R.; 13-12-14 at 21:40.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E-Bay Carrier just sold Bruce Parker (RIP) The Carrier Forum 31 26-10-17 02:29
Moving Cattle aj.lec The Sergeants' Mess 3 11-02-10 21:55
carrier sold Ledsel The Carrier Forum 14 01-05-08 21:51
brengun carrier sold at auction farmergeoff The Carrier Forum 22 31-10-06 10:52
UC carrier market value 6thairborne The Carrier Forum 3 30-09-06 17:08


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 17:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016