MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24-05-11, 13:02
anthony urek anthony urek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 54
Default Unusual Detroit 6046 6-71

Hi all, I am new here and hoping someone can shed some light on a Detroit Diesel 6-71 engine I have in my shed.
It is unusual in a couple of ways.
Firstly it has a brass tag near the rear stating 6046(see pic attached) which is GM's code for tank. However Grant tanks (M4A2) which ran the 6-71 twins did not have a tag here. They had a slightly different tag on the transfer case which also states the reduction ratio of the gearing in the transfer case.
Also the Grants and Shermans which ran the twin diesels have 2 motors that spin clockwise when looking at the flywheel from the rear of the motor. My motor spins anticlockwise from the rear and should do so according to the model number (671RA54) on another GM tag on the motor.
So am I right in guessing that this motor could be from a late Valentine? Which would explain the rotation and the need for a different tag on the motor as there is no transfer case to put one on.
The motor has the same exhaust manifold, front cover, water manifold and 3 air filters as found on the Grant tank but a different model number and rotation.
Hope this makes sense.
Attached Thumbnails
006.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-05-11, 15:20
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,521
Default

I was always under the belief that the twin detroits in the Shermans were counter rotating.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-05-11, 18:21
tankbarrell tankbarrell is offline
Adrian Barrell
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob love View Post
I was always under the belief that the twin detroits in the Shermans were counter rotating.
You're not alone, some refuse to believe they don't even when you show how they couple together!
__________________
Adrian Barrell
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-05-11, 23:02
anthony urek anthony urek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 54
Default

Nope....both spin left in Grants.
Can anyone verify this once and for all.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-05-11, 23:07
roy206's Avatar
roy206 roy206 is offline
koekwous
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: netherlands
Posts: 78
Default

the gm 6046 fitted in sherman and also m10 tank destroyer turns seen from front counterclockwise and the outcoming propshaft from the gearbox turns clockwise. your twinset is a runner right now?
see our complet restored twinset running

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adEy5j4XiJk
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-05-11, 21:47
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 462
Default

twin diesel set up was clockwise from flywheel end(manual states rotational directions should be veiwed from fan end, hence counterclockwise rotation in manual), camshafts were counter rotating, left hand engine counterclockwise from flywheel end, right hand engine clockwise from flywheel end.
Hope this is not too confusing.

Perry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-05-11, 00:53
anthony urek anthony urek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 54
Default

Great video Roy!Beautiful motors! I jumped when you gave her a rev. It looks like both your motors are spinning anticlockwise from the front, is this correct?


But Perry, in your Sexton, you are saying your twins run opposite
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-05-11, 01:57
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 462
Default

Both engines crankshafts turn counterclockwise when standing in front looking at the fans. I think I only muddied the waters adding the talk about what the manuals say. Detroit Diesel always refers to rotation direction when looking at the engine from the flywheel end. The military refers to rotation direction from the fan end in the manuals. So the twin set up has both crankshafts turning the same direction, counterclockwise when observing from the fan end of the motors. The camshafts turn opposite direction because you are feeding the engines from opposing sides.
My Sexton uses the 9 cyl. radial.

Perry
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-05-11, 02:31
anthony urek anthony urek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 54
Default

Thankyou Perry for clarifying that.
Yes both engine cranks in the 6046 twin pack spin in the same direction.

Now back to my engine which spins the opposite way to the normal 6046 twins. Valentine maybe????
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30-05-11, 14:15
cantankrs cantankrs is offline
Alex McDougall
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kalgoorlie, Western Australia
Posts: 200
Default 6046

Anthony,

I'm pretty sure my 6046 army manual says that only the crossbox had the serial number for the 6046 power pack and that they didn't record the individual engine numbers. (Pretty odd idea that) So curious if your motor has the pictured plate affixed directly to it. Can you provide a more general view of the motor and include the plate in the frame?
Also a shot of the fan drive as that might clear up any Valentine possibility.

Alex
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-05-11, 11:43
anthony urek anthony urek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 54
Default

Hi Alex,
Here are some pics of the motor. The first one shows the whole motor with the two plates evident. The brass 6046 tag on the rear and the silver model tag behind the rear air filter. As I stated in the first post the 6046 tag is different to the usual 6046 tag on the crossbox as it does not list the reduction ratio.
The second pic of the front of the motor shows where the fan extension housing has been cut off and welded over. This motor was found on an abandonded irrigation pump. The exhaust has also been modified to facilitate an upward outlet. The water manifold is broken and is currently removed.
Cheers.
Attached Thumbnails
001.jpg   002.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31-05-11, 21:15
roy206's Avatar
roy206 roy206 is offline
koekwous
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: netherlands
Posts: 78
Default

here is a picture from our twinset,as you can see the tagplate is mounted on the gearbox.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016