MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > Post-war Military Vehicles

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-22, 13:49
maple_leaf_eh maple_leaf_eh is offline
Terry Warner
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shouting at clouds
Posts: 3,083
Default US Army Stryker Mobile Gun System

The US Army is going to retire its 105mm 8-wheeled armored (sic) cars. Wasn't this the one Canada tried out too? Not criticizing the decision one way or another, but the question of guns vs missiles, and who supports who comes to mind.

https://www.militarytrader.com/mv-101/stryke-out
Attached Thumbnails
tank annoyer 2 from fb.jpg   tank annoyer.jpg  
__________________
Terry Warner

- 74-????? M151A2
- 70-08876 M38A1
- 53-71233 M100CDN trailer

Beware! The Green Disease walks among us!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-22, 14:20
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,433
Default Mobile Gun System

Yes, the Canadian plan was to scrap the Leopards and go with the MGS, and we all saw how that worked out.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-22, 11:26
Jakko Westerbeke Jakko Westerbeke is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 285
Default

The best part about retiring those Canadian Leopards, IMHO, is that the Netherlands decided to get rid of its Leopard 2s “because they are not useful in the kinds of wars we fight these days” — that is: in Afghanistan.* One of the main purchasers was Canada, which promptly sent them to Afghanistan …

* The actual reason for selling off the Leopard 2, of course, was, “We can save money by not having tanks.”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-22, 12:27
Ed Storey Ed Storey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,433
Default Stryker MGS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakko Westerbeke View Post
The best part about retiring those Canadian Leopards, IMHO, is that the Netherlands decided to get rid of its Leopard 2s “because they are not useful in the kinds of wars we fight these days” — that is: in Afghanistan.* One of the main purchasers was Canada, which promptly sent them to Afghanistan …

* The actual reason for selling off the Leopard 2, of course, was, “We can save money by not having tanks.”
Jakko,

You are very cynical, hehehehe. Yup, that was the same story here in Canada as DND started hauling Leopards off to the ranges and putting them on display in parks. Of course, in the mad flurry to reimagine the armoured corps, no-one ever mentioned that the MSG had some serious problems that were being overlooked.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Mobile Feeding Unit edstorey Post-war Military Vehicles 0 24-05-09 21:26
US 5th Army Mobile Radio Station cliff The Softskin Forum 2 09-05-09 13:13
Mobile Canteen servicepub (RIP) The Softskin Forum 76 08-12-08 15:55
Max Hedges has his cab 12 mobile Keith Webb The Restoration Forum 3 06-03-08 19:50
Alternative to Mobile Gun System Roger Lucy Post-war Military Vehicles 9 18-09-07 10:28


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 21:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016