MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31-12-21, 18:51
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,365
Default Sherman MkVc Firefly 17-pdr question

To the Sherman gurus ....

Why did the Brits need to reconfigure the 17-pdr with a horizontal sliding block breech for the Sherman Firefly when the production AT gun used a vertical sliding block? Was it, as Wiked-pedia states, due to internal space considerations?

Was this same horizontal breech configuration used in all other 17-pdr-equipped Brit tanks or was the vertical block of the AT gun used in some? The Centurion Mks 1 & 2 used the 17-pdr Mk.6 which had the horizontal sliding block breech.

Thanks

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-12-21, 18:58
James P James P is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 386
Default

In the confined space of a tank turret a horizontal breech makes complete sense as it allows full range of motion in elevation and depression of the gun.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-12-21, 19:43
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,365
Default

I agree, and can see a number of advantages for a horizontal breech block, particularly with the block sliding away from the loaders position, which would then make the handling of the large 17-pdr round easier to move sideways into alignment with the chamber.

The elevation of the gun would be restricted by, among other things, the design of the mantlet/turret external interface and internally what is located beneath the downward swing of the breech. So with regard to internal room, it would depend on the turret basket depth and stowage design. Was this so cramped in the Sherman as to dictate the manufacture, in the middle of a war, of a different breech when the vertical sliding breech was already in production?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-12-21, 20:26
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,365
Default Distance breech ring to turret ring?

I've had another thought: what is the distance from the back of the 17-pdr breech block to the turret ring on a Sherman Firefly, compared to the length of the longest 17-pdr round?

Maybe that was the restricting feature - the extra 8 or so inches further back required to move a 17-pdr round into alignment with the chamber of a vertical breech, compared to a horizontal breech.

Thoughts?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-12-21, 21:01
James P James P is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 386
Default

You also have to factor in the human fit and ergonomics, I think there is a bit more to making the machine fit the man (or man fits machine) then turning the 17 pdr gun by 90°, there is a stowage reconfiguration and no doubt the breech lever is different.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-01-22, 03:41
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,365
Default

Hi James,

I'm sure it was not as simple as just the distance between breech ring and turret ring, but I have to start somewhere in getting to a better idea than just wiked-pedias blanket 'internal space considerations' and I don't have access to any of the original development reports.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-01-22, 11:34
Jakko Westerbeke Jakko Westerbeke is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 278
Default

IIRC this has some answers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__Y8YJeas4I though I don’t feel like watching all of it again to find them
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-01-22, 19:18
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,365
Default

Thanks Jakko, the visuals certainly provide some good information.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-01-22, 21:37
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 751
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
To the Sherman gurus ....

Why did the Brits need to reconfigure the 17-pdr with a horizontal sliding block breech for the Sherman Firefly when the production AT gun used a vertical sliding block? Was it, as Wiked-pedia states, due to internal space considerations?

Was this same horizontal breech configuration used in all other 17-pdr-equipped Brit tanks or was the vertical block of the AT gun used in some? The Centurion Mks 1 & 2 used the 17-pdr Mk.6 which had the horizontal sliding block breech.

Thanks

Mike
Mike

Horizontal sliding breech on Mk4 and Mk7 which went into Firefly.

The only components which are the same as AT gun are Barrel and Muzzle Brake (assuming you have the Mk1 to Mk7 barrel).

The difference between the Mk4 and Mk7 is the breech spring for the semi-auto mechanism - the earlier version was prone to sticking.

The 17pdr in the Mk1 Centurion is pretty much the same gun as the Firefly too.

Hope this helps

Tim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sherman Firefly Turrets........... Chris Preston The Armour Forum 7 20-12-18 00:21
Sherman Firefly VC Tim Bell The Armour Forum 19 30-03-17 15:32
Sherman Firefly Ic 1st Hussars Johnny Canuck The Armour Forum 13 04-12-13 04:10
Sherman Firefly on D-Day luc désormeaux The Armour Forum 5 10-07-05 16:00
Sherman Firefly in Italy Larry Hayward The Armour Forum 1 01-04-04 10:07


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 13:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016