#1
|
||||
|
||||
North African Valentine w/ 7.92 Mortar
Hi
This question was asked on another (Generally non-Allied) Forum and has received no answer. I had thought you fellas might be able to help. Any pics or links to share? regards D |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: North African Valentine w/ 7.92 Mortar
Quote:
The Valentine 7.92in flame mortar was an experimental vehicle consisting of a Valentine with turret removed and replaced by a fixed heavy mortar intended to project a 25 pound TNT incendiary shell to demolish concrete emplacements. Maximum range of this weapon was 2000 yards and it's effective range was 400 yards. It never made it past the trial phase by the Petroleum Warfare Department. Cheers two photos of it on trial:
__________________
Mark |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Mark
You're a gem. Thank you very much for your quick and most useful reply. Forum members helping Forum members and now Forums helping Forums. best regards Darrell |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Mark |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
A zipperhead getting Tank info from a ground-pounder!!?? Yikes!! I hope none of my co-workers see this!! regards D |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Mark |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Valentine w/ 7.92 Mortar
Quote:
Came across this photo of the 7.92in flame mortar, that was mounted on the Valentine. Cheers
__________________
Mark |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Mark
Tanks for the additional photo. I still don't quite understand why it was called a flame Mortar. I see that it was an incendiary projectile but also that it was intended for bunkers and emplacements. How so. What effect did it have on the concrete? I can only opine that it was an air sucker as it burned and those inside died of suffocation. Maybe it had some penetrative qualities? I dunno. regards D |
|
|