MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19-05-21, 05:40
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default M4A2 Sherman clutch shim question

We’ve got the two 6-71 Detroit’s out of the Sherman for resealing due to oil leaks.
Both clutches have shims between the housing and flywheel. Hopefully the sketch shows the location and the other photo shows a shim.

One clutch had one shim per bolt, the other clutch had two. The shims are 0.032” thick.

Cleaning up the heat checking involved removing a total of 0.020” from the flywheel and pressure plates, ie 0.012” from one and 0.008” from the other.

The only manual I can find that mentions these shims is for the M36, which uses the hull of the late M4 A2 HVSS. All it says is when friction disk gets down to 0.370” thick, remove the shims. Our friction disks are 0.455” and 0.425” thick so well above this minimum spec.
Trouble is I lost track of which clutch is which when we got then surfaced. Anyone have any info of how the OEM determined these shim thickness?

Thanks,
Malcolm

Click image for larger version

Name:	83CDD2F0-8FEA-4DA2-8926-554B1795EA6E.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	302.8 KB
ID:	122059

Click image for larger version

Name:	0F74D19B-6140-4D03-ADDD-AE621F544435.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	595.0 KB
ID:	122060
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-05-21, 00:29
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 374
Default

Malcolm,

My read is that both engines should have had 2 x 1/32” shims per bolt (for a total thickness of 1/16”)

All references seem to agree with two shims when total thickness of clutch driven plate(disk) is greater than .370”, and no shims when thickness is less than .370”.
Attached Thumbnails
D38E1AD0-1AD4-4145-B8D9-A1F17BF07BF2.jpeg   FFF84C5E-8565-4787-9175-A6B2D98C778E.jpeg   64AA25E5-3651-4C6F-B089-5F22EE0BF51C.jpg   9EE06BF8-F783-4258-BD27-E03D6C1A3FAE.jpeg   59E3BBBF-F617-47EE-8583-A3C0C87EC167.jpeg  

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-05-21, 00:31
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 374
Default

Information from post-war civilian manuals
Attached Thumbnails
492AA058-7265-4657-9F78-8E8AAFF1EDB5.jpeg   82ACC100-A5D3-4783-B2E6-850D87D93776.jpeg   12694272-A7FD-47A7-9DF0-E25567A62C32.jpeg   2F70EAF3-351A-4317-86FE-4906AC484E98.jpg   8FC52F00-10DD-4A1F-801B-E5062008D833.jpeg  

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-05-21, 00:43
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 374
Default

There is some discrepancy regarding minimum thickness of clutch driven plate (disk) which would indicate that it should be replaced.

In my prior post I included images from TM 9-1750G (Power plant maintenance) which indicate the plate should be replaced if it is less than .303”

TM 9-745 (M36B2 vehicle maintenance) agrees with the .303” thickness.

TM 9-731B (M4A2 vehicle maintenance) shows .340” as the minimum thickness.
Attached Thumbnails
B46109E1-8F43-460E-A2D9-BFC7276BDA2E.jpeg   AE966900-1E0D-40FA-BF63-1CB051ACA8E0.jpg   37DA7681-C4B9-4A30-83B6-09B1D7EC213D.jpeg   1B78C7F6-7195-4F95-BE9E-34B330983646.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-05-21, 04:17
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Fantastic info, Colin! Thank you very much.

You’re right, all the info you gave me clearly states that, with the thickness of frictions I have, there should be two 1/32” shims per bolt. That’s what I’ll install. Mind you, I’ll have to make 12 new shims, which will be a pain. Wonder how much laser or water jet cutting costs??

And the Detroit manual gave some interesting info. The shims aren’t to control the diaphragm spring pressure on the pressure plate, as I had assumed, but to keep the release bearing in its working range. I assume that allows the bearing to release enough to allow the spring to apply full pressure and to pull spring back enough to let friction plate spin freely.

Thanks again. I love MLU.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-05-21, 04:35
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,517
Default

When I google the shim number listed in Colin's part manual, it does come up as a shim for detroit diesel. Might be worth a try asking the local detroit dealer. The number seems to be expanded a little to D81260-755429 SHIM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-05-21, 04:38
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Thanks, Rob. Will do.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-05-21, 06:46
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,534
Default

It looks to me that the thrust bearing pulls the center of the spring (diaphragm) (away from the flywheel) to release the clutch? The reverse of "normal" If so, then you are still getting full spring pressure, but without the shims, there possibly won't be enough travel at the thrust bearing to properly release.
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....

Last edited by Lynn Eades; 20-05-21 at 06:52.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-05-21, 15:03
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm Towrie View Post
We’ve got the two 6-71 Detroit’s out of the Sherman for resealing due to oil leaks.
The rule about Detroits is if they are not leaking, they are out of oil. This applies to Harley Davidsons as well, and most of the older Chev engines.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-05-21, 00:07
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 462
Default

The old timers always said, "the only thing keeping the oil in was the paint".
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-05-21, 02:32
Jesse Browning Jesse Browning is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 366
Default

Are there match marks on the parts? Supposed to be, but my clutch didnt have any either.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-05-21, 03:22
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn Eades View Post
It looks to me that the thrust bearing pulls the center of the spring (diaphragm) (away from the flywheel) to release the clutch? The reverse of "normal" If so, then you are still getting full spring pressure, but without the shims, there possibly won't be enough travel at the thrust bearing to properly release.
I don’t know, Lynn. When I tighten the bolts clamping the clutch housing above to the flywheel I can feel the torque increasing from the diaphragm spring loading up. If I had 1/16” of shims between housing and flywheel, there would be less compression on the spring when bolts tightened down.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-05-21, 03:29
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

The engine compartment was filthy, it was embarrassing, and it was miserable to work on.
It was time.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21-05-21, 03:31
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Browning View Post
Are there match marks on the parts? Supposed to be, but my clutch didnt have any either.
You mean match marks to identify which parts come from which engine? Didn’t know that so I haven’t been looking for them.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21-05-21, 13:16
Jesse Browning Jesse Browning is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 366
Default

The match marks are usually for keeping everything balanced, but if marked differently could give a clue to origin.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 21-05-21, 13:17
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,534
Default

Malcolm, so based on what you have said, then the purpose of the shims might be to prevent over bending the spring and risking breakage ( as well as the travel)
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 13-06-21, 07:28
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

I have to confess, guys, since we removed a total of 0.020” total from both the flywheel and pressure plates to clean up the heat checking, I decided to install both clutches with just the one 0.032” shim per bolt. My justification is that my experience working on GM engines and transmissions is that the design engineers were way too anal about setting allowable specs and wear tolerances. I defy anyone to notice any difference between a 6-71 running with spec 0.016” valve clearance (4 valve head) and say 0.018” clearance.
Also the GM spec of 1.460” for the injector timing, with no tolerance specified, has at least one guy on YouTube making the effort to get it that exact spec, I seriously doubt if +/-0.010” makes an detectable difference.
If we find out I’m wrong on the shims when we get the engines back in the Sherman, I will of course not be posting it here.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-07-21, 05:45
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

The clutch release bearings have been installed. And also the transfer case inner housing with the release forks, and the outer housing.
Much to my relief, there was some free play on both clutch release forks, indicating that the setup with just one 1/32” shim under each clutch cover bolt was allowing the release bearings to unload.
The sketch in post #1 above above shows that if bolting up the transfer case had left no free play on the clutch forks, we would have had to pull the t/c off and add more shims to move the diaphragm spring inner bore towards the flywheel.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-21, 07:08
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm Towrie View Post
I have to confess, guys, since we removed a total of 0.020” total from both the flywheel and pressure plates to clean up the heat checking, I decided to install both clutches with just the one 0.032” shim per bolt. . . .

If we find out I’m wrong on the shims when we get the engines back in the Sherman, I will of course not be posting it here.
Malcolm
Good effort Malcolm. Nice to see you catch a break.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M4A2 Sherman Mike Gray The Armour Forum 31 09-02-16 21:11
Wanted: Sherman M4A2 rad fans Frank v R For Sale Or Wanted 2 11-05-14 01:26
Sold: 1945 M4A2 76mm Wet Sherman 45jim For Sale Or Wanted 9 29-06-12 02:41
Painting question regardinga Sherman M4A2 tank Royal Canadian Ordance Corps The Restoration Forum 8 22-05-10 15:11
M4A2 Sherman III kevinT The Armour Forum 39 17-05-08 10:24


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016