#1
|
|||
|
|||
Understanding Br/Cdn Div Sigs, circa 1944-45
I was wondering whether anyone knows of any document or publication that explained in a bit more detail the wireless nets that a typical British or Canadian Infantry or Armoured Divisional Signals would operate, based on the later war organisations?
I have the relevant War Establishment tables for British and Canadian Divisional Signals issued from late 1943 to early 1945. I also have the Royal Signals Pocket Book, Wireless Diagrams (1945) as a reprint. Taken together these do give a good overview of the wireless links of Div Sigs, but there are still things I'd like to try and have a better understanding of. My current understanding (excluding links to Main Corps, flank formations and air) of the Div Sigs nets in Br/Cdn Inf/Armd Divs is;
I did wonder if there was some kind of guide on how many frequencies a Div Sigs would have to provide, depending on the number of units in the Div, and also likely any attachments. I though I'd seen a reference to a Divisional list somewhere... Any guidance would be appreciated. Gary
__________________
www.bayonetstrength.uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Gary
I wish I had an answer, but you've posed a very specific question beyond my knowledge. As I drilled down through the battalion organization, one thing struck me about NCO strength. http://www.bayonetstrength.uk/Britis...%20Nov1944.pdf The bulk of the rifle battalions were Ptes and Cpls. To my mind few NCOs or WOs. I'd have expected more for some reason. As well where the various appointments were assigned. The one that caught my eye Regimental (err? Battalion) Sergeant Major was not attached at the hip to the OC or Admin O, but to the Intelligence Officer. The Intelligence staff, the Clerks and the Snipers would therefore become the RSM's direct troops.
__________________
Terry Warner - 74-????? M151A2 - 70-08876 M38A1 - 53-71233 M100CDN trailer Beware! The Green Disease walks among us! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Gary,
The 3 Cdn Infantry Division Signals orders for Operation Overlord can be found here: https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/o...eel_t7619/1780 The link above is one if the net diagrams which I believe is near the tail-end of the orders (recent changes to the heritage.canadiana.ca site make scrolling through images much slower). The frequency list is at image 1716: https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/o...eel_t7619/1716 These orders might help resolve some if your questions. Colin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks very much for that link Colin. I posted about the subject on the https://groups.io/g/wireless-set-no19 and someone provided very similar documents for 2nd Canadian Infantry Division for a couple of date points through 1944.
Overall quite similar to what I sort of thought might be the case, and providing confirmation of the alternative frequencies for the command net, rear Division net and the RA/RCA net. The 'lateral' comms for the Brigades aren't something that appear in the Royal Signals "Wireless Diagrams" booklet for July 1945. Also the Brigade "Q" nets do appear to be individual to the Brigade, with just a rear link set on the Rear Division "Q" net. The separate frequencies for the RCE Companies do differ from the wireless diagram book, which shows all outstations on the same net as the control station in the CRE's command vehicle. If anyone trips over something on these lines for a later war British Division, Infantry or Armoured, I'd very much like to see it! Thanks "maple leaf eh" - compared to a US unit in particular, relatively few Sergeants on the WE for a British or Canadian Infantry Battalion, with a lot more Corporals by comparison. Gary
__________________
www.bayonetstrength.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
An interesting thread, Gary.
Thanks for setting it up. David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hello Gary.
Sorry I cannot shed much light on this topic for you, but it is headed in a very interesting direction for me. The Canadian Marconi Company was very involved in the production, design and development of the Wireless Set No. 9, from just before the start of World war 2 to the end of the war. Not much of their production documentation has survived, but from what has, one thing that is quite noticeable is how proactive they were in canvasing both the Canadian Army and British Army regarding things they could improve upon with the No. 9 Set throughout its production. As early as late 1942, early 1943, CMC was aware of concerns from both armies that they were running out of frequency options for their growing wireless nets. At that point in time, the bulk of their communications fell in the 2.0 to 8.0 Mc range. While designing the Wireless Set No. 9 Mk II Cdn (which would get renamed the Wireless Set No. 52 Cdn), Canadian Marconi factored that concern into their design and this set came with three frequency bands covering from 1.75 to 16.0 Mc. What I am curious about now is whether or not the surviving documentation from 1944 and 1945, for either the Canadian, or British Armies, shows any evidence of them taking advantage of these newly available frequencies in their various wireless nets? David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The WS52 would be considered part of the WS2 line of sets, based on the original numbering scheme from the 1930s (until things got out of hand during WW2), which was:
1 - "front line usage" (as close to the enemy as you use wireless), WS1, WS11, WS21. Intended to be Battalion to Brigade and within RA Regiments. 2 - Brigade to Division (WS 2, WS12, later the WS12HP that led to the WS53), probably also included the WS22 as a 'short range set' for divisional units and the Artillery (because the WS21 was deeply crap). 3 - Division to Corps (WS3, WS23, WS33, WS43 (Canadian). WS53 (developed from WS12HP), WS63 (Australian, I think, unless that was the 113) 4 - Corps to Army (Abandoned) 5 - GHQ to Home WS5(LP), WS5(HP) 6 - Army Chain (>1,000 miles) three were built: Aldershot, Gibraltar & Hong Kong. (Replaced by No.5HP, Marconi SWB 8E & SWB 11, (and WS 15 which was later renumbered to E 10 in the Larkspur Era (30kW SSB transmitter)).) 7 - AFV set to replace the Daylight Signalling Lamp & flag waving. 8 - Company to Battalion (once Wireless was seen to be a Good Thing), WS8, WS18, 48 (US) 58(Canadian), 68 and finally WS31 (Wireless sets split further to Platoon level with the 38, 78 & 88 sets) 9 - AFV sets (anyone getting a WS9 (British _or_ Canadian) into a WW2 AFV must have been a magician - though there was a 'vertical stack' case made for it). Canada (Marconi) took the British ST&C design and reworked it to something very much better that took readily available valves. To avoid confusion it was redesignated the WS52.) AFV sets continued with the 19 & 29 (Canadian). What was the question again? Ah! WS52 and the change in frequency range compared to the WS No.9. The AFV sets were originally limited to 1.875 - 5.0 MHz (WS7, WS9, WS19 Mk.1) which was woefully inadequate and increased to 2.0 - 8.0 MHz that allowed overlap with the Infantry (and other users). The WS52 (and 62) were given a rather wider range so as to be usable as "Rear Link" sets and work to the WS12/R107 and WS53/R107 in Division and Corps. The RF Amplifier No.2 was developed to boost the output of a standard WS19 to allow that to be used for Rear Link working, while the Canadians developed their own WS19HP that was a very different beast but arrived too late to see much service in Europe. Best regards, Chris. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Belfield Collection circa 1980 | Stuart Kirkham | The Armour Forum | 33 | 18-11-16 21:40 |
Morris 6 wheeler on test circa 1928 | Mike Kelly | The Softskin Forum | 0 | 21-10-13 12:55 |
Cdn Army film, circa 1955 | servicepub (RIP) | The Sergeants' Mess | 0 | 07-11-10 05:24 |
Studebaker US6x6 gets a lift! Circa 1960s | oztankboy | Post-war Military Vehicles | 0 | 02-03-10 06:00 |
Sigs.Exercise..... | Alex Blair (RIP) | The Sergeants' Mess | 4 | 11-06-06 04:19 |