![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
And another
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Murray, we're lucky you couldn't resist!
The bofors seems to be USA manufactured, with the Mk 1 welded platform and with the characteristic american combat wheels, but with all the british mods, like the shields and the Stiffkey sight.
__________________
George Cross Island Last edited by Godwin Hampton; 10-03-05 at 22:18. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmm? The British Mk 1 (riveted) platform or carriage was copied in USA and designed M 1. Most of these issued as lend-lease to other countries.
The welded version of the British Mk 1 carriage developed in USA was known as M 2 and in a later version M 2 A1. Photo: US 40 mm AA gun M 1 on carriage M 2.
__________________
Foxhole sends |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know this is post war but sort of related.
I was going through some of my late Fathers old books etc the other day and came across Gun Drill, for Gun-Equipment 40/70 L3 (land service) when used at hand or local power control. 1964. Also User Handbook Truck, 3ton, GS, Cargo, 4x4, Bedford-R Truck, 3ton, GS, Cargo, with winch, 4x4, Bedford-RLW Chassis, 3ton,GS, Recovery, Light, Bedford-RLC Issued Jan 1958 W.O. Code No. 18374 He was in the Royal Artillery, 1947-1973 Of any interest to anybody? Cheers Kevin T |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hello Stellan!
Quote:
Quote:
78 guns – ordered by the Polish Government in Sweden 414 guns – manufactured in Poland 168 guns – exported by Poland 358 guns – the number of guns that served in the Polish Army in September 1939 Sources: Adolf Stachula Dylematy polskiej artylerii przeciwlotniczej okresu miêdzywojennego (The Dilemmas of the Polish Anti-Aircraft Artillery of Inter-War Period) Przegl¹d Wojsk Lotniczych i Obrony Powietrznej (The Air Force and Air Defense Review) Poznañ, September 2002 Piotr Rozwadowski Polskie armaty przeciwlotnicze 75 mm wz. 36/37 oraz 40 mm Bofors (Polish 75mm and 40mm Anti-Aircraft Guns Models 36/37 and Bofors) Dom Wydawniczy Bellona, Warsaw 1998 ISBN 83-11-08906-X Marek J. Aszyk Uzbrojenie Wojska II Rzeczpospolitej. Armata przeciwlotnicza kal. 40 mm wz. 36 (Armament of the 2nd Republic. Bofors 40mm Anti-Aircraft Gun Model 36) http://www.wojsko18-39.internetdsl.p...ien/opl40.html Polish Bofors 40mm guns wreckage pictorial after 1939 Campaign ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by Crewman; 08-04-05 at 00:11. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
One more US specimen. Photo taken in 1943.
![]() Library of Congress LC-USW33-000888-C Last edited by Crewman; 08-04-05 at 01:50. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Crewman,
Very interesting, and at the same time very sad pictures of the Polish Bofors guns. They seem to tell us though that they went down fighting! Another thing that struck me is that all the wheels have been removed.......sabotage?
__________________
George Cross Island |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hard to say if sabotage... According to my knowledge all types of wheels are desired and valuable "war goods" for civilian people all over the world, always and at every war. If sabotage then rather Polish troops sabotage against the Germans. I think that majority of the guns showed at the pics has its vital parts destroyed by Polish troops to make the guns unuseful for the enemy. Best regards C.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Crewman,
The only one showing wheels in the background has had them removed complete with the axles. This could not be done with the original Swedish platform! Is this a Polish design? It seems to have 3 arms and levelling jacks, rather than the usual 4. The Bofors with the barrel facing the camera and with the small shed behind also seems to have this type of platform. I have never seen this before today. Thanks for sharing them with us.
__________________
George Cross Island Last edited by Godwin Hampton; 08-04-05 at 02:09. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Best regards C.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Ackermann steering and the Lockheed brakes were fitted to the original design. In fact the reason the axles could not be made removable was because the brake master cylinder / reservoir was inside the rear longitudinal girder, with the wheel brake cylinders at the rear wheels. Flexible brake hoses allowed the axle to rotate and thus lower the mounting onto the jacks. To remove the axle would mean having to remove the flex hose, and this would allow fluid out and air in, and necessitate bleeding the system after reconnecting!
The British Mk.2 Platform had the master cylinder / reservoir fitted directly to the rear axle, so this could be removed without disturbing the braking system.
__________________
George Cross Island |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Polish-built 40mm Boforses ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by Crewman; 08-04-05 at 03:54. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Crewman,
The British wheel system I described was for the totally different Mk II platform designed by the engineers at Nuffield Mechanisations to be much simpler than the original swedish design. It can be seen in many of Stellan's photos and can be easily identified by the baloon tyres and the tubular outriggers. One of the guns shown in your latest set of photos is actually a Russian copy of the Bofors. See Stellan's colour photo at the top of the previous page. Sorry to have confused you about the wheels/brakes...
__________________
George Cross Island Last edited by Godwin Hampton; 14-04-05 at 22:47. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This book you can find (for example) here: http://www.neriton.apnet.pl/product_...roducts_id=272 or here: http://www.lideria.pl/sklep/opis?nr=56177 or here: http://www.historyton.pl/catalog/pro...oducts_id=1511 Woj |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Woj,
Thank you! Writing the posts I did not know this new book. You know that Polish bookstores with the military history books are pressed down by the tons of Western books and sometimes it is hard to find something new in Polish. Unfortunately the subject of the AA artillery is underestimated by our publishing houses and, to some extent, also by the authors that is why sometimes there is a space for speculation. The same goes for various technical aspects of the Polish Bofors 40mm guns. It would be hard to tell that small booklet I mentioned (ISBN 83-11-08906-X) is a kind of very good monograph of the Polish-built Bofors AA guns. Thanks and best regards C.
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Best regards, Woj |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
I posted some pictures to this thread last month of the 2nd Yorkton LAA Bty, 2nd LAA Regiment in Holland in 1945. The picture attached to this post is B Troop of the same Battery at Detling Airdrome in Surrey, England 1941. According to the Battery's diary, they were at Detling from April to July 1941. The equipment according to the Diary was "semi-mobile Bofors with No.3 Predictors, 4 to a Troop."
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know this thread is about towed Bofors, but since we're all such great fans of the gun, I thought you'd like to see some pics I took last week aboard the U.S.S. Texas (BB35)
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
ORDNANCE, Q.F. 40-MM., MARK 1/2 on MOUNTINGS, 40-MM. A.A., MARKS 9 AND 10 and PLATFORM, 2-WHEELED, 40-MM. A.A., MARK 1 The Ordnance was the standard Mk 1* gun fitted with a muzzle brake to preserve stability during firing because of the lighter mounting and platform. The Mk 9 mounting is a modified Mk 3, while the Mk 10 is a modified Mk 4. The frame, platform and seats were removed and replaced by others of different design. The electrical gear and the shields were also removed. The Mk 1 platform was a new design, having 3 girders ( or outriggers ). Two were swung together to form the towing bar, while the third slides in and out of the platform. Brakes were Warner electric, as used on other British heavy artillery pieces.
__________________
George Cross Island Last edited by Godwin Hampton; 12-05-05 at 23:02. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
This winter I picked up a 3 phase generator which was designed to go with the US or UK version of the 40MM it was used to feed the fire control system and is set up for 3 phase at 50 or 60 cycles. The manual explains the power settings for the British fire control system.
__________________
Phil Waterman `41 C60L Pattern 12 `42 C60S Radio Pattern 13 `45 HUP http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/ New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Britsh produced a particular generating set for the Bofors and Predictor. This consisted of a Coventry Climax 4 cylinder side-valve engine of 847cc capacity belt-driving a Crompton Parkinson 3-phase alternator. Output was 2.75 KVA ( 130 volts, 12.2 amps ) at 3000 rpm. Frequency was 50 cycles per second.
I have the remains of two such sets, from which one can hopefully be assembled in the future. If your generator is this type, I have the Field Manual, which only covers the set,though. Could I be so cheeky as to ask for a photocopy of your Manual, as mine gives no details of the actual Fire Control. I will naturally cover any expenses incurred.
__________________
George Cross Island |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
I plan to scan the manual in to a pdf file so it will be no problem to send it to you. The manual is for generator so it is just talking about the use and how to set it for the different voltages and cycle rate.
__________________
Phil Waterman `41 C60L Pattern 12 `42 C60S Radio Pattern 13 `45 HUP http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/ New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very nice of you, Phil! Thanks.
__________________
George Cross Island |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.canadianmilitarypattern.com/ to my site http://www.canadianmilitarypattern.com/Generator.htm directly to the Generator Page
__________________
Phil Waterman `41 C60L Pattern 12 `42 C60S Radio Pattern 13 `45 HUP http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/ New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So far as I can see this body was the Morris-Commercial body as fitted to the CDSW, which of course went into production by Wolseley Motors initially in 1939 and then Austin Motors the following year. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Has anyone got a photo of a CDSW Bofors tractor please?
Last edited by David_Hayward (RIP); 26-05-05 at 20:22. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sort of off thread, but.....
If a Bofors gun is fitted in an AC130 gunship, should it still be called an AA gun? If not, what then? Pro-Aircraft? Anti-Ground? |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|