![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The past week or so I have been tabulating some nominal roll information
![]() Acting Lance Corporal > L/Cpl > A/Cpl Acting Lance Sergeant > L/Sgt > A/Sgt Forgive me, but from my civilian background, these "intermediate" appointments seem kinda pointless. A title (and presumably responsibility) without a pay increase? I see many of these same men were also granted reversions "at their own request". ![]() Thanks, Bill. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
as far as I know a lance sgt was a rank perculiar to the Guards regiments regards malcolm
![]()
__________________
mally B |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Acting rank is a temporary rank assigned to a person who is performing the duties normally performed by someone of higher rank. He receives pay and conditions appropriate to the higher rank.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
'Lance Corporal' has been described as the worst job in the Army (to which I can personally attest - there is a short sharp learning-curve!), and although the posn of 'L/Sgt' was extinct by my day I understood it to be a probationary position that the soldier could be 'reduced' from without stigma if he proved unequal to the task. At least that's how it was in the Seaforths. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also a civilian who has struggled with understanding how this stuff worked. Changes since the end of the war, variations for Guards, Rifles etc. units just make it more complex. So with a grain of salt, my understanding for the Second World War as follows:
Bear in mind that in the Second World War, rank structure within a unit was fixed (ie. there were a static number of Cpls allowed), so you only got promoted to fill a gap in a higher rank. In a rifle platoon, a man promoted to Cpl was promoted in order to lead a section, not simply to reflect his experience, etc. While I am sure it is not entirely correct, my broad understanding of the current CF is that ranks like Cpl or M/Cpl are as reflective of time in as much as responsibility, though I admit to ignorance of how the intersection of seniority and responsibility is resolved. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
CHIMO! Derek.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|