MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 11-02-04, 22:47
Richard Notton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Flimsie Cans

Quote:
Originally posted by Bob Moseley
Hi Hanno
Point of interest in OZ the two gallon can is also known as a flimsie, amongst my crowd anyway.
I have noticed this from other lists and it causes a huge amount of confusion. The 2 gall can is certainly not flimsy at all and why ever the name has gotten transferred in the antipodes is perhaps lost in the mists of time now.

Although much ridiculed and hated, the flimsy was a sensible and logical course at the time, we had barely enough 2 gall cans to support the BEF, about 1 million at the time, and they were expected to forage for fuel.

It was obvious the smallish capacity plus work and material in the 2 gall can precluded any attempt to mass produce the thing with the war on as it were, so the flimsy was adopted as a bigger capacity container using the minimum of now scarce material that could be made by any semi-skilled blacksmith and needing no logistics for return; the shortcomings were well known at the outset.

Its well documented in the official history of the RASC.

R.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016