![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And your photo is also interesting Ed. It looks like a m62 wrecker with non-us pattern tires, and a carrier with the domestic dnd numbering system. Did they use that system in Germany post war?
I did not know you could lift a carrier evenly using just two sling points. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I certainly would not try that two point lift at home! Yes, the M62 Wreckers replaced the wartime Diamond T Wreckers being used by the Canadian Brigade in Northern Germany in the mid-1950s. In Germany, the new M-Series vehicles used what is now the CFR system while the older wartime vehicles all employed the domestic DND numbering system.
Of course you have to keep in mind that at the same time any RCAF M-Series vehicles used the RCAF vehicle registration system. M135CDN 1B 56-A51.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suppose the headlamp on that carrier would help prevent it from rolling onto it's side.
We still had a very old RCAF water buffalo when I was at MooseJaw in the early 90s for waste fuel. I think it had the RCAF numbering system on it. The Deuce is interesting. A very bald tire on the front left, an almost bald tire on the intermediate left, and a almost new trak-grip pattern tire on the rear left. Guess they didn't get the memo about the rears supposed to be the relatively same size. The cargo box on it is different from any that I have seen. It is missing the angular re-enforcement over the wheel wells. It also seems to have a straight up exhaust stack, missing the curve on the top of the Cdn trucks. I wonder if this was an early purchase from US stocks? It also has some funny mirrors, but likely a locally sourced improvement over the little 5" round mirrors that came standard on those trucks. Last edited by rob love; 24-04-25 at 21:58. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did see a US produced very early bowser at a local deuce graveyard. It had the prefix XM on the model number, but was clearly CFR'd. I had a look back 13 years here on MLU and here is what I wrote about that truck at the time:
Quote:
Perhaps we had some trials M135, and the army, in typical fashion, got rid of the non-conforming trucks by generously passing them on to the airforce. Or we may have simply mirrored the US early production. I note the airforce deuce does not have the hi-lo bow system in it's sideracks. Last edited by rob love; 25-04-25 at 18:44. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point, as there is certainly the potential for that RCAF vehicle to have been a pre-production vehicle. It is amazing that there is still so much to learn about the story behind the Canadian M Series vehicles.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did a little checking through some of my manuals and discovered these M135CDN images were used to illustrate the Data Summaries. This one on the March 1952 edition,
M135CDN Truck ECC 124101 copy.jpg and this one one the March 1972 edition. M135CDN Truck 56376 ECC 124101 copy.jpg |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: CF Vehicle first aid kit | derk derin | For Sale Or Wanted | 1 | 26-04-13 14:08 |
What vehicle is it ? | Eduard Sorokin | The Softskin Forum | 14 | 15-01-12 01:16 |
Vehicle ID | Bill Murray | The Softskin Forum | 5 | 03-08-08 23:41 |
What is this for a Vehicle | Marco C. | The Softskin Forum | 5 | 03-07-07 21:56 |
What's the vehicle? | Keith Webb | The Softskin Forum | 14 | 26-06-05 05:20 |