MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-08-24, 19:09
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 413
Default

Maurice,

I looked through the approx 1000 images that cover the turn-in of armoured vehicles from Canadian units at the end of the war.

I did find 269916, 269917, 269920, and 269921 as vehicles turned in by various units but I did not notice 269919. While your vehicle certainly fits into the right WD number block, it might not have been issued to a Canadian Unit (or could have been with a Canadian unit for a period of time, then spent time in Workshops prior to reissue to a different unit).

The records related to the turn-in start here: https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/o...eel_t12742/431

Here are the links for the turn-in of 269920, and 269921:
https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/o...eel_t12742/620
https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/o...el_t12742/1055

There are other groups of records within the various 25 CADR War Diaries (Squadron and Regimental) where your vehicle might appear.

Colin
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-08-24, 22:20
Maurice Donckers Maurice Donckers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beek Holland
Posts: 418
Default

big mistake !!!!! the T number is 269916 sorry sorry
.
I was writing it from memory , and went now outside to check it and i wrote down the wrong number in this forum this morning ,can i still change the tread?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-08-24, 23:22
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice Donckers View Post
big mistake !!!!! the T number is 269916 sorry sorry
.
I was writing it from memory , and went now outside to check it and i wrote down the wrong number in this forum this morning ,can i still change the tread?
Hi Maurice, I have edited your first post and the header of the thread.

PS: any member can edit their own posts: click the edit button, change the text and then click save

Last edited by Hanno Spoelstra; 23-08-24 at 21:37. Reason: Edited
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-08-24, 02:18
Colin Alford Colin Alford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 413
Default

Maurice,

Please see the attached images.

The front of the form is blurry but it appears to me that 269916 was turned in by 22 CAR (Canadian Grenadier Guards)

If this is correct then I presume your vehicle must have passed through more than one unit as the tactical marking for 22CAR was 52.

Link to record: https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/o...el_t12742/1101
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1927.jpg (558.7 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1928.jpg (441.7 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-08-24, 08:29
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Wow Colin, that’s a great find!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-08-24, 10:16
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin Alford View Post
Maurice,

Please see the attached images.

The front of the form is blurry but it appears to me that 269916 was turned in by 22 CAR (Canadian Grenadier Guards)

If this is correct then I presume your vehicle must have passed through more than one unit as the tactical marking for 22CAR was 52.

Link to record: https://heritage.canadiana.ca/view/o...el_t12742/1101
Nice find... and therefore it will exist elsewhere in the records.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-08-24, 12:18
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

269916 - Appears to have been received by F squadron 25 CADR on 27th March 45 from 164 Vehicle Park.

Not sure who/what 164 vehicle park were (hope someone else knows), however this may support the belief the vehicle was transferred from another unit. Presumably the vehicle was issued to 22 CAR shortly after this

oocihm.lac_reel_t12740.465.jpg

Tim

Last edited by Tim Bell; 23-08-24 at 13:22.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-08-24, 11:14
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

Condition Classes were I to IV, where I was best condition.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-08-24, 11:36
Maurice Donckers Maurice Donckers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beek Holland
Posts: 418
Default

but Tim, it wasn't in class 1 condition when I found it. It will be on its first outing in 2 weeks , for the liberation of the south over here 80 years ago , a few small interior bits are still missing , but it is 98 % complete again.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-08-24, 11:53
Maurice Donckers Maurice Donckers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beek Holland
Posts: 418
Default

And Jakko , there are several period pictures where the fireflies have a name on the rear of the turret .
I have a picture here from in geleen , and the whole parked column has a name on the back
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-08-24, 12:20
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice Donckers View Post
but Tim, it wasn't in class 1 condition when I found it. It will be on its first outing in 2 weeks , for the liberation of the south over here 80 years ago , a few small interior bits are still missing , but it is 98 % complete again.
Look forward to seeing it.

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-08-24, 21:33
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice Donckers View Post
but Tim, it wasn't in class 1 condition when I found it. It will be on its first outing in 2 weeks , for the liberation of the south over here 80 years ago , a few small interior bits are still missing , but it is 98 % complete again.
Looking forward to see it running, Maurice. No doubt it will be a stunning restoration.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-08-24, 10:14
Tim Bell's Avatar
Tim Bell Tim Bell is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall
Posts: 804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maurice Donckers View Post
big mistake !!!!! the T number is 269916 sorry sorry
.
I was writing it from memory , and went now outside to check it and i wrote down the wrong number in this forum this morning ,can i still change the tread?
I will look again!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Info wanted on Sherman IC T 269916 Maurice Donckers The Armour Forum 14 30-03-23 23:35
Making a sherman mk V out of a sherman M4A4 Gordon Kibble The Armour Forum 3 03-08-16 02:01
1H Sherman V DD Tony Viste The Armour Forum 0 13-12-08 02:56
Re: Sherman Ic Chris Johnson The Armour Forum 27 20-04-05 11:50


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016