|
|
|
|
#1
25-01-22, 18:32
|
|||
|
|||
Practice
Looks much too sophisticated to have been made just to drop on the opposition's dummy airfields.
More likely a practice bomb, as you say, Hanno. Wooden artillery rounds were common for practice - why not wooden practice bombs? Cheap and quick to manufacture. It has a metal sheathed nose by the looks of it. I wonder if there is a cavity in the back for a smoke pot or similar? Mike 
|
|
#2
25-01-22, 20:13
|
|||
|
|||
|
What would they have used for training personnel in loading bomb trailers, general handling procedures or loading various aircraft?
David
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ...dream come true!!!!! | r.morrison | The Sergeants' Mess | 2 | 23-08-12 19:05 |
| Too incredible to be true? | kevin powles | The Carrier Forum | 20 | 16-02-12 07:31 |
| True or Not? | Barry Churcher | The Sergeants' Mess | 8 | 12-10-08 17:14 |
| A funny ad | Keith Webb | The Sergeants' Mess | 10 | 28-07-05 15:25 |
| Is This True? | Vets_Dottir | The Sergeants' Mess | 7 | 03-04-03 14:29 |
Hybrid Mode
