![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Another meter type you cannot do this with is the thermocouple ammeter used in some radio equipment (may be marked "aerial current", "RF amps", "HF ammeter", or similar), where the measuring circuit is a very short piece of resistance wire (so it doesn't waste much of the transmitter power) with a thermocouple spot-welded to the middle of it. The meter movement has no air-damping vane attached (because the thermocouple is also low resistance and provides magnetic damping to the pointer movement), and if you touch a flashlight cell (even a tiny one like an AA) to the terminals, the short-circuit current through the resistance wire will blow it like a fuse. A dealer did this before my very eyes at the War & Peace show (Beltring) one year, and made contact before I realised and shouted "Stop!".... "What?" "You've just destroyed that meter?" "Nonsense, the needle moved." "The needle moved _once_, and will never move again because you've blown the wire inside. Try it again and see." (Dealer tries it, predictably nothing happens.) "Do you still want it, I'll reduce the price?" "No, it's beyond repair now." (etc.) Pity really, it was for the Aerial Coupling Unit 'J' and one of the hard to find plug-in meters. ![]() (I did spend some time explaining why he blew it, I don't know if the lesson stuck.) This is why I normally carry a pocket multimeter to shows and radio rallies, so I can test them (safely) before purchase. Chris. p.s. There exist "Hot wire" RF ammeters as well, and they are just as fragile. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blasting is complete...now it's time to get to work. Not too bad of shape overall, thankfully. I don't like all the braze repairs as I'm going to have to grind them out and replace with welds if they are compromised. I included a picture of 2 x 3/8" holes that were not supposed to be there that I filled in last night, not too bad if I say so myself
![]() Sadly the motor has developed a small oil leak at the rear after running it for an hour or so. I'd hate to have to take it out again if it's the rear main or welsh plug. It did seem to slow down once it got hot. I'll let it go through numerous hot and cold cycles and see where I am prior to putting the tub back on in a month or so.
__________________
Peter Phillips 1952 M38Cdn 1953 M100Cdn 1951 PE-95K Gen Set MVPA Cdn Forces 1986-2006 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There were warnings about military vs civilian rear main seals, but as I recall the civilian ones were too tight. So tight in fact, they were causing rear bearing problems and leakage because of the amount of heat. Since then, some dealers have had proper rear main seals made up.
That warning aside, I have had it where the rear main seals take a little bit of time to set in. And they can be replaced while on the vehicle. I used to do them in about an hour, although it almost takes me that long to get onto the floor and back up again these days. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's good to know, Rob...I'm really hoping this thing just needs to "run in" to seal up. You cracked me up about taking an hour to get down and up again, lol.
Got the carb kit from Brian today so that's on the list to do soonest.
__________________
Peter Phillips 1952 M38Cdn 1953 M100Cdn 1951 PE-95K Gen Set MVPA Cdn Forces 1986-2006 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have rebuilt 3 jeep engines recently and I will only use the BEST made rear main seals as I have not had a single leak from any of them. The one engine I had to replace a rear seal as it was burnt up and took out the rear main bearing from being too tight of fit on the crank.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Peter Phillips 1952 M38Cdn 1953 M100Cdn 1951 PE-95K Gen Set MVPA Cdn Forces 1986-2006 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The last engine I did was about 5 years back. The lack of availability of the rear main seal swayed me to putting in the rope seal. It leaked for a very short time, then sealed up.
John Bizal sells what is reputed to be the Best brand rear seal. The old part number for the military is reported as National 5585, but no longer made. The civilian seals that were a problem are reported as part number 800093. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Info needed: M38cdn | Lyle Watkins | The Restoration Forum | 0 | 01-11-17 20:47 |
For Sale: 1952 m38cdn | Ryan Harriman | For Sale Or Wanted | 0 | 12-08-16 05:03 |
For Sale: M38Cdn Air Cleaner | Jeep-Livin! | For Sale Or Wanted | 0 | 08-03-16 03:52 |
M38CDN Tub | M38CDNBill | For Sale Or Wanted | 0 | 12-01-08 01:49 |
M38cdn | Denis | Post-war Military Vehicles | 2 | 03-03-04 17:16 |