MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13-02-21, 15:04
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default

A very interesting story about chrome rifle bores,thanks for sharing. Its funny but now days most of us associate chromed barrels with chinese rifles like the SKS. I don't know if any of our modern sport rifles manufacturers use chrome bores. My understanding about SKS bores is that they are highly resistant to corrosion.
On a slighly related topic I found a video on the net showing the use of a non electrical conducting "arbor" or " twisted core" with wires twisted along it. It is inserted in a barrel blank and electricity applied and it erodes the bore beside the twisted(spiral) electrodes to create etched rifling in the barrel. AN interesting idea, ever heard of this before?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-02-21, 16:36
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 464
Default

Quite often standard steel bore cylinders used chromed piston rings, and on the chrome bore cylinders, standard steel rings, no chrome. It takes forever for chrome rings and chromed bores to seat in.
I had a number of interesting conversations with different companies that do the channel chroming on aircraft cylinders regarding the choking of the bore diameter. C4 cylinders were to have .008" to .010" of choke when new, anything less than .004" was NS.
One company in particular said they had done barrels with no choke and up to .010".
Maximum build up of chrome seemed to be .006"(.012" on dia.) for the repairing of used cylinders.

Regarding chromed rifle bores, most competitive shooters now prefer non chromed bores for accuracy. Hard chrome makes cleaning easier, and greatly extends the life of the barrel.

Last edited by Perry Kitson; 13-02-21 at 16:46.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-22, 03:15
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default piston ring question

I wanted to revive this post to ask for some input from our knowledgable membership pool. I have been hunkered down at home (like many of you) for a long time now, and have been using the time to get some longstanding jobs finished. One job has been to continue to sort through and catalogue my collection of engine parts. One item I have found raises questions so here goes;
I have a bunch of sealed ring packages for the 975 that are described (in one book) as being "tinned". They are light coloured and almost look like they have been spray painted with aluminium paint. The coat seems to wear off or rub off relatively easily. I have attached photos where you can see the cast iron base material beneath the coating. These spots are not corrosion.
Does anyone know anything about tinned rings, application, pros and cons?
Any input appreciated.
C4ringsa.jpg

C4ringsb.jpg

RIngs2.jpg

RIngs3.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-22, 16:02
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

I can only think that the tinning is for quicker bed in or corrosion resistance in storage. I have never heard of this before in any application so, sorry, not much help.

David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-10-22, 20:46
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default chrome vs steel

In various previous posts I have talked about chrome vs steel cylinders. One of the big advantages to chrome is their resistance to corrosion in damp or high moisture environments. I have made mention of an engine I opened up to check for damage ( and found smashed pistons, cylinder case etc) and point out that it was equipped with steel cylinders. (first photo)

you can see that the cylinder bore is badly rusted and even in the best of circumstances a steel bored cylinder will likely need some level of reconditioning to be serviceable again. So now check out the next group of photos. They show an engine, (opened up to ensure no catastrophic damage) with chrome bores. This engine was rebuilt in 1945, has been stored outside under cover in the weather extremes of Canada. You can see there is only the spattered beginnings of rust on the chrome, some of which I wiped off with an oily rag. I seems possible that the pistons may be removed without too much difficulty and may even prove to be reusable in a fresh overhaul.
The downside of chrome (as Perry pointed out in post 138) is the rings take much longer to seat and they typically use more oil. However for a tank owner who doesnt have the advantage of a temperature controlled storage environment or who doesn't start the vehicle regularly, chrome may well be the way to go. Overall, a nice engine considering it has been sitting all these years!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg broke#2.jpg (300.5 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Holland5.jpg (143.0 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg hollandrebuildtag.jpg (224.9 KB, 0 views)

Last edited by Bob Phillips; 31-10-22 at 21:01.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016