MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Gun Park

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-04-19, 11:52
Nicholas Perry Nicholas Perry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 3
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnixartillery View Post
Larry ,

I don't publicly display any of my Artillery but happy to invite anyone with a similar interest up to Yorkshire for a private viewing.


Rob..................rnixartillery
That's a stunning restoration job. Is this piece now in Australia then?

While researching I don't suppose you came across anything about 3" AA Guns mounted on either 25pdr or 17pdr carriages (sources differ) and built and used for UK Defence in 1942 or 1944 (again sources differ). I've been following up on these ever since Hogg's British and American artillery book came out.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-04-19, 12:10
tankbarrell tankbarrell is offline
Adrian Barrell
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 860
Default

I found a reference to that in an official history.
In The development of artillery tactics and equipment, published in 1951 by the War Office, it states that '100 old 3" 20 cwt guns were collected, provided with a special 12 1/2 lb. shot and mounted half in Churchill tanks and half on 17-pr carriages, the production of which was in advance of that of the guns. The Churchill mounting was handicapped by its small internal traverse-only 7 degrees- and the guns so mounted were allotted for home defence only. Of the remaining 50 on 17-pr carriages, 25 were allotted to the Middle East and 25 to Home Forces.'

The reference to production of 17-pr carriages being in advance to that of the guns rather contradicts the idea that 17/25 pr came about due to a shortage of carriages for the 17-pr.
__________________
Adrian Barrell
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-04-19, 12:48
Nicholas Perry Nicholas Perry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 3
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by tankbarrell View Post
I found a reference to that in an official history.
In The development of artillery tactics and equipment, published in 1951 by the War Office, it states that '100 old 3" 20 cwt guns were collected, provided with a special 12 1/2 lb. shot and mounted half in Churchill tanks and half on 17-pr carriages, the production of which was in advance of that of the guns. The Churchill mounting was handicapped by its small internal traverse-only 7 degrees- and the guns so mounted were allotted for home defence only. Of the remaining 50 on 17-pr carriages, 25 were allotted to the Middle East and 25 to Home Forces.'

The reference to production of 17-pr carriages being in advance to that of the guns rather contradicts the idea that 17/25 pr came about due to a shortage of carriages for the 17-pr.
Very interesting, I'm glad there is something behind it. The Churchill Gun Carriers were built in 1942 with Canadians sent off for training just before Dieppe. Which suggests that your point about the carriage/gun mismatch is even more relevant.

I had a working theory that it could be down to barrels removed for Fireflies until it became apparent that; the 17pdr in the Firefly isn't the same as any other vehicle or field mounted gun, possibly due to separate Australian work on the Sentinel 17pdr, also by then (1944) the carriage/gun production seemed to be working out to the extent that guns were widely available in Italy which tended to get stuff later than Home/Invasion Forces.

Several sources state that the 17/25pdrs were returned to the UK after N. Africa possibly they got the 3" barrels? According to Rob's link in the first post 150 built by Weirs, 100 had their barrels removed and put on standard 17 pdr carriages leaving 50 to start the Italian Campaign. 100 3" barrels available less 50 for Churchill Gun Carriers. Hmm...... I've just sent an email to Weirs asking if there is any more information available. I'll keep everybody informed.

Last edited by Nicholas Perry; 19-04-19 at 13:38.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-04-19, 17:22
tankbarrell tankbarrell is offline
Adrian Barrell
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 860
Default

All 17 pr barrels were dimensionally the same, very early Mk Is were slightly different at the muzzle but the differences between the various marks of 17 pr are in the breech. There are two distinct types of breech mechanism but your point is still valid as the Firefly gun, Mks IV and VII, would not suit the field carriage.
__________________
Adrian Barrell
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016