Info needed: HUP s/n 3844536696 markings discovered

[lincwel]

It would be HQ 4 Amoured Div RCEME

[rob love]

I agree with Jordan. The leaf looks a lot more like the stylized 1960s leaf that got onto our current flag. It wouldn't be the first time that an older layer of restoration got cleaned up and assumed to be original markings.

[David Herbert]

Remember that if it was restored in say 1975 it could have had those markings applied then (when there was much less knowledge of what was correct) and then have been repainted several times since, and could easily have fallen on hard times at some point in the second half of its life, despite having survived its first half. That would give a patina to the restoration that would look like original paint. The modified American tail lights were then considered a good way of fitting indicators but still being military and might suggest an older restoration.

Great truck for Normandy !

David

Ha ! Cross posted with Rob !!

[cordenj]

Originally Posted by David Herbert

Remember that if it was restored in say 1975 it could have had those markings applied then (when there was much less knowledge of what was correct) and then have been repainted several times since, and could easily have fallen on hard times at some point in the second half of its life, despite having survived its first half. That would give a patina to the restoration that would look like original paint. The modified American tail lights were then considered a good way of fitting indicators but still being military and might suggest an older restoration.

Great truck for Normandy !

David

Thanks David,
I've just added the Jeep lights to give a little more illumination.
I was interested to find the markings today, but am not saying they are original...although that would be good.

Every HUP photo I can find seen has the serial numbers CZ42*****, so I am wary of a CZ39*****

[Alex van de Wetering]

I agree with Jordan on the maple leaf. "3943990-4100000" in the chilwell list is marked as "not taken up", but maybe that range of numbers was used at the end of the war.

Is it me, or could there be "45" written on the RCEME colours...in stead of "40"? "45" wouldn't make sense though......

Alex

[cordenj]

Originally Posted by Alex van de Wetering

I agree with Jordan on the maple leaf. "3943990-4100000" in the chilwell list is marked as "not taken up", but maybe that range of numbers was used at the end of the war.

Is it me, or could there be "45" written on the RCEME colours...in stead of "40"? "45" wouldn't make sense though......

Alex

Hi Alex,

It was definitely "40" appearing as I sanded off the topcoat

[David Dunlop]

John.

That’s a nice CMP you have there. The rear hatch to the left of the door looks interesting. I do not recall the HUP or HUA being equipped with such a hatch. They were typically solid rear quarters. However, the HUW, equipped for wireless had such a hatch to vent the chorehorse and I think the ZL Machinery version may also have had such a chorehorse hatch.

Is there any evidence inside the rear compartment that it may have had metal bins and shelving attached/fitted?

David

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Hello John, nice buy!

Much of its history in the hands of collectors can be found here on MLU Forum. These markings are from previous restorations.

Hanno

53E5914A-383E-47C0-BF45-50215BB203CB.jpeg

[Jon Skagfeld]

L>R:

Hanno
Looks like Art Bell
Don't know
Don"t know
Geoff Winnington Ball
Brian Gough

I'm guessing mid '70s?

[Barry Churcher]

Hanno, Art Bell, Herb Danter, Bob Doak, Barry Churcher and Brian Gough

Taken in Whitby On