MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-18, 04:05
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default 975-46

Great pictures Dennis!
can you imagine having to change an engine with equipment shown... lots of fun! Just like winter camping.
I believe one of these helicopters resides in an aviation museum near Ottawa.
Tims comments always welcome!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-18, 12:17
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

I wonder where they got the very long ladder from ? Too long to be needed locally or on the ship and even to transport easily. Very nice set of photos though Dennis.

David
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-18, 01:21
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default 975-46

Not only great pics but when you look closely...
in photos 2&3 you can see that an engine cooling shroud ( just like a tank engine) has been removed from the original engine and fitted onto the replacement in the can. This makes sense in this application where there is no propeller slipostream to cool the engine. Perhaps with a clutch assembly it could run a vehicle??
Also, in the background the original engine is stripped of its exhaust and mounts which will be refitted to the replacement.
Good point about the ladder in a land with no trees!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-18, 02:36
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Just curious, was the engine installed with the crank in the normal horizontal orientation? Those photos give me the impression it might have been installed with the crank vertical, which would make me curious about oil scavenging and carb type.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-18, 02:47
Dennis Cardy Dennis Cardy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Surrey British Columbia
Posts: 132
Default

Bob and David. Here's 246 airborne with 245...Two of only three RCN HUP-3's that Canada bought in the Spring of 1954. Piasecki only built 30 of the HUP-3's. So a pretty rare version. Note only 246 carries Labrador's sort of...kind of ..SeaHorse crest. It would seem from these photo's, that the R-975's were not that reliable. Not exactly sure when or where these photo's were taken. But can only have been a month or two into the voyage. BTW..Good notes about the cooling fan being charged over. The cooling fan has direct implications for AFV installations.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg LZA HUP-3 245 & 246 Aug 57.jpg (188.4 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-18, 02:45
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default 975-46

A couple of quick points about the helicopter - engine application.
In researching the helicopters two interesting ideas showed up. First, one source claims that the reason the -46 engine was used was because the US military had a surplus of these available. I am not sure what other significant application rthere was for -46 engines in the 1950s, though radial engines were used in other versions of helicopters.
There was also comments about -46 engines having problems, but little clarification as to what the problems may have been. While I am not a radial engine expert my inclination is to believe that radial engines ( like many aero engines) are high maintenance machines. I have heard many anecdotal stories about engine failure in this type of engine ( oil leaks, blown out spark plugs etc etc, but not just Continetal Wright) can anyone add more information about reliability, or problems not associated with ground machine applications?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-10-18, 01:54
Dennis Cardy Dennis Cardy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Surrey British Columbia
Posts: 132
Default

Bob Phillips As you say...aircraft style engines are high maintenance machines. The case is thin aluminum castings with the steel cylinders bolted onto it. They are highly stressed and easy to break. For those installed in MV's, you have to keep the idle at 1000rpm to prevent main bearing failure due to lack of oil. They also break if they are over-revved. The allowable P&W R985 maximum rpm is only about 50 or a 100 rpm below what will hurt the engine. Oil in the lower cylinders ...aircraft or tank...has removed many a cylinder head..never mind entire cylinders. In answer to your question..aircraft type engines require far greater attention to handling. Many of the broken engines are the result of mishandling by the operator. Another hint...don't use the engine to slow your tank descending a hill. It can easily over-rev the engine and blow off a jug. According to the operators manual ...that's what the brakes are for. A lot cheaper to replace the brake pads... than replacing the engine.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg r-975-m4ankengine-107w-2.jpg (150.5 KB, 7 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-10-18, 23:49
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 464
Default

Helicopter gearboxes, and by extension engines, are exposed to far greater torque than an aircraft engine and prop pulling air. When a helicopter is hovering, and especially close to the ground, there is a horrendous amount of resistance to moving the air, which can result in "over torquing" the drive train.
I am guessing that helicopter radials could suffer the same fate as tank radials when loads were too great.

Last edited by Perry Kitson; 17-10-18 at 01:26.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-01-20, 20:13
Hanno Spoelstra's Avatar
Hanno Spoelstra Hanno Spoelstra is offline
MLU Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 14,868
Default HUP - but not of the CMP variant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis Cardy View Post
Bob and David. Here's 246 airborne with 245...Two of only three RCN HUP-3's that Canada bought in the Spring of 1954. Piasecki only built 30 of the HUP-3's. So a pretty rare version. Note only 246 carries Labrador's sort of...kind of ..SeaHorse crest. It would seem from these photo's, that the R-975's were not that reliable. Not exactly sure when or where these photo's were taken. But can only have been a month or two into the voyage. BTW..Good notes about the cooling fan being charged over. The cooling fan has direct implications for AFV installations.
Spotted last December: UH-25B (HUP-2) C/n 253, BuNo 130076. Location: Baris Business Park roadway roundabout in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. This aircraft was originally used by the US Navy and was later transferred to the French Navy. It is owned by Baris since 1973.

(I can post this here - a HUP is a HUP, eh? )

79371912_1014684562202085_541257787301167104_n.jpg

Because of the drive-by nature of my own photo I added some more NMPs for clarity.

80325075_1014684612202080_3401083665675976704_n.jpg 79425522_1014753502195191_6632405540636983296_n.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-01-20, 02:10
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default R975 rear main bearings

I think you make a good point Peter, clearly the large channel around the bearing exterior is an oil channel ( you can see the small holes leading to the interior) so sticking a notch which presumably holds something must restrict or enhance oil flow?? don;t know but at some point will pull a bearing out of a battered crankcase to see.
Hanno, in my book a HUP is a HUP and more importantly in this day and age they have both survived the scrap man! Thanks for the post!
B.P.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-02-20, 02:18
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default R975 rear main bearings

To follow up my last post on rear main bearings I offer a photo of the -46 version, as I have done for most of the other main parts. Note the much heavier flange area. For those not familiar with workings of these engines, the bearing flange sits flush in the crankcase but the projecting threaded portion supports the camshaft.
bearing-46.jpg
On another topic, a couple of photos of nine mystery boxes, dug out of storage after almost 70 years...what could they be??
mysteryboxes.jpg
All export packed in waxed cheesecloth over heavy cardboard cartons...
very nice indeed!
mysteryboxes2.jpg

Last edited by Bob Phillips; 01-03-20 at 13:19.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 22:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016