MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-18, 08:07
Big D Big D is offline
Darryl
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 661
Default M8

Hi Malcolm,

That would be the restoration of my M8 you have seen. Has the clutch on yours ever worked properly?

I to was surprised at the size of the hydraulic tubing for the clutch. As you are probably aware, the clutch slave cylinder on the M8 is quite chunky, and quite a bit bigger than the slave cylinder for the throttle. The throttle uses 3/8" hydraulic tubing though so with the lines on your clutch being even smaller than that at 5/16" doesn't seem quite right. Perhaps the line size simply doesn't allow sufficient volume of fluid to be pushed through to activate the slave cylinder?
__________________
Cheers,

Darryl Lennane

1943 Willys MB
1941 Willys MBT Trailer
1941 Australian LP2A Machine Gun Carrier
1943 White M3A1AOP Scout Car
1944 Ford M8 Armoured Car
1945 Ford M20 Armoured Car
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-18, 10:19
Russell Boaler Russell Boaler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 75
Default

Dealing with fluid flow on a day to day basis I'd say that the size of the tubing is probably due to the amount of fluid that needs to be transferred. If the pipe is small you'd wind up with a pedal that is just slow to depress rather than a clutch that won't fully disengage. It would also mean a lot more pressure being needed at the master cylinder to push the fluid through the pipe (compared to the larger pipe) if depressing the clutch at normal speed. Maybe that increased pressure is causing some bypassing in the master cylinder?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-18, 05:30
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell Boaler View Post
Dealing with fluid flow on a day to day basis I'd say that the size of the tubing is probably due to the amount of fluid that needs to be transferred. If the pipe is small you'd wind up with a pedal that is just slow to depress rather than a clutch that won't fully disengage. It would also mean a lot more pressure being needed at the master cylinder to push the fluid through the pipe (compared to the larger pipe) if depressing the clutch at normal speed. Maybe that increased pressure is causing some bypassing in the master cylinder?
I agree, Russell. The pedal is easy to depress with 5/16" tubing, which is actually quite large for automotive brake and clutch systems, so I have no idea why 1/2" tubing was thought necessary.
I'll check for bypassing of the m/c cup seal by measuring what slave cylinder rod movement I get, as described above.

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-18, 05:21
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big D View Post
Hi Malcolm,

That would be the restoration of my M8 you have seen. Has the clutch on yours ever worked properly?

I to was surprised at the size of the hydraulic tubing for the clutch. As you are probably aware, the clutch slave cylinder on the M8 is quite chunky, and quite a bit bigger than the slave cylinder for the throttle. The throttle uses 3/8" hydraulic tubing though so with the lines on your clutch being even smaller than that at 5/16" doesn't seem quite right. Perhaps the line size simply doesn't allow sufficient volume of fluid to be pushed through to activate the slave cylinder?
Darryl, yes, it was that thread on your very nice restoration I was referring to. I drove the M8 a few years ago and my recollection is it drove ok, so I think something has deteriorated.
When I saw your reference to 1/2" tubing, I said, that can't be right. I've NEVER seen 1/2" tubing on an "automotive" braking or clutch system. But the parts list confirmed it.
I can see no advantage to using tubing that large in this application. I used a pressure bleeder applying only 15 psi to the m/c reservoir and when I cracked the bleeder on the slave cylinder, I got a FOUNTAIN of fluid coming out. So 5/16" tubing seems to be quite adequate for good flow. And it's not like the tubing causes a hard pedal from squeezing fluid through restrictive tubing. The pedal effort is very light.
I did some measurements on the m/c and slave cylinder. The m/c pushes out 20 cc per stroke. The slave cylinder needs 25 cc to go its full stroke of 1 1/4". So the slave cylinder is stroking 1" when the pedal is floored. Now I need to confirm that I am getting 1" movement of the slave cylinder rod and also if 1" movement is enough to fully disengage the clutch plates.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ferocious brakes on our M8 Greyhound Malcolm Towrie The Armour Forum 10 27-09-18 02:39
M8 Greyhound Brake Fluid? Malcolm Towrie The Armour Forum 5 27-09-18 02:32
RCD's M8 Greyhound John McGillivray The Armour Forum 14 03-02-12 15:08
M8 Greyhound in Australia. Ryan The Armour Forum 15 14-09-09 13:32
F8 clutch - help! david moore The Restoration Forum 7 16-01-08 05:17


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016