MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24-09-18, 22:51
Bob Phillips Bob Phillips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 449
Default 975-46

Perry thanks very much for the impeller info! Looks a whole lot like the -46 impeller, does anyone know the significance of the holes through to the back?
As I mentioned earlier in this post tghere were weak points in the 975 engines, the impeller shaft/ bearings were certainly one. A second was the master rod/ crank bearing which often failed due to abuse or possible oil starvation. Any other known issues?
I also need to thank Perry for the opportunity to photograph his C4 cylinders next to a -46 cylinder. Please note -46 cylinder does not have an exhaust elbow attached.
7a.jpg

8a.jpg

9a.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-09-18, 23:15
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

I would suggest that the holes in the impeller are to more balance the pressure on each side of it as without them it would draw itself towards the side with the vanes on it (as it sucks air from that side) causing high axial load on its bearings. A certain amount of recirculation will happen but it may be that that was judged to be the lesser evil.

In my experience the primary cause of failure of these engines (in preservation) is that people let them idle at too low a speed and the master rod to crank bearing fails due to oil starvation as most of the lubrication pressure of this bearing is from centrifugal force within the crank itself and that is negligable below 800rpm. They will idle nicely at 500rpm so people think that that is better - wrong !

David
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-09-18, 06:47
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

I looked after about 1500 pumps in a nuke plant and I agree with Perry. Angular contact bearing pairs must be shimmed or matched so that the axially unloaded bearing (not the loaded) is still preloaded enough to ensure the balls roll and don't skid. Skidding causes nasty damage to happen. Modern Vortec blowers which spin up to thousands of rpm are supported by tiny angular contact bearing pairs and your best bet for a good rebuild is to send them back to Vortec, IMO. It's that tricky to set them up.

And I agree with David. The holes in the impeller back shroud are to reduce axial load on the shaft bearings. This is common practice in pump design. The holes bleed the discharge pressure seen on the back side of the impeller back to the suction side. This reduces the thrust load towards the suction side.

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-09-18, 15:18
Jesse Browning Jesse Browning is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 366
Default

I learned from a pump manufacturer that the holes are to relieve the vacuume pressure, not to protect the bearings, but so that sewage (or oil in engine application) doesn’t get sucked past the seal.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-09-18, 17:07
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 464
Default

David,

Good point on the low idle oil pressure issue. I was once told by a pilot with decades of experience flying radial engined aircraft, that after a proper warm up, RPM was kept no lower than 1000 RPM for that reason.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-09-18, 22:36
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

Thanks Perry,
It also says it in the operating section of the manuals for the various radial engined Sherman variants and of course private owners are really good at reading manuals and doing what they are told.....

David
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-09-18, 23:22
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,595
Default

So if a guy needs to overhaul one of these, is it doable, or does it need to be sent somewhere that specializes in the radials? The boss keeps talking about wanting to get the Sexton going. I's hard at this point to even know what the problems with the engine are....something initially caused it to be parked, and about 6 years back a volunteer tore out the magneto and all the ignition wiring. We just got back the magneto (untouched) after about 5 years of it sitting at the local air museum.

Any recommendations for rebuilders? We had company in Winnipeg (standard aero) who used to do all the Dakota engines a few decades back, until the air force retired them in 1989. Or are the C1 radials too oddball for a regular commercial rebuilder?

I think I saw in the US a company that said they do them for around the $30K mark. They warned that they were often fixing other rebuilder's mistakes.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-09-18, 03:55
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Browning View Post
I learned from a pump manufacturer that the holes are to relieve the vacuume pressure, not to protect the bearings, but so that sewage (or oil in engine application) doesn’t get sucked past the seal.
Gotta disagree, Jesse. As far as I know, those holes are to reduce axial load on the pump, or in this case supercharger, bearings.
What can cause oil getting sucked in past the shaft seal on an overhung impeller design like this is having the impeller back shroud too close to the supercharger rear housing. The tight gap between the shroud and casing causes a pumping effect which can reduce the pressure down at the shaft below atmospheric.

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-09-18, 04:12
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

We acquired a Sexton a few years ago and I pulled the R975 out of it and dismantled it. It was a total write-off, 5 of the 9 rods snapped. So the engine is quite an impressive static display in our museum now.

I would agree with Jesse. There's is nothing particularly high tech or mysterious about the design. But you would have to be SO careful with reassembly. I regret I didn't have the opportunity.

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016