![]() |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
David
I think there is a difference, between testing Anti tank weapons during development and the training of troops in the use of anti tank weapons. During development the weapons are test on the intended adversary, but these test are not for the public eye, (sometimes promotion videos are shown afterwards). I have passed by one development test once during my service time, It was very hush hush and held in the furthest part of the training grounds and everything covered up. Training of troops in the use of the weapon, does not require much of the target, though it is helps with the recognition, if the target is the material used by adversary or the shape of a tank etc. But any old tank will do, and normally they are bit more robust, and will take the beating better than a plain steel plate. Furthermore there is nothing more annoying, than having to stop in the middle of a firing exercise, and then go out and repair the target plate, because some penetrated it and hit the structure holding it.
__________________
1941 Chevrolet, Cab 12 CGT, 7A2 body 1944 Ariel W/NG 1944 Scammell Pioneer SV/2S x 2 1955 Austin Champ, 04BF45 1946 Chevrolet 5400 COE, Civilian |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Farley Mowat vehicle collection mystery | Guy Grenadier | The Softskin Forum | 1 | 17-07-16 13:58 |
| R.I.P. Farley Mowat | John McGillivray | Tributes | 14 | 04-06-14 01:43 |
| Stug III running | Bob Cohoon | The Armour Forum | 0 | 26-09-11 18:14 |
| StuG IIIG on ebay | Treadhead | The Armour Forum | 11 | 31-05-09 21:47 |
| For Those Bored ... A Repro STUG III | Robert Dabkowski | The Armour Forum | 6 | 22-07-08 20:25 |