MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-18, 22:30
Mike Cecil Mike Cecil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cody, Wyoming, USA
Posts: 2,372
Default

Lynn,

S for Sugar: As did the British Army during the Second World War and into the 1950s.

The 1952 War Office Signals Pam lists the phonetic alphabet that includes S for Sugar, but the 1955 pam lists the NATO standardised phonetic alphabet which includes S for Sierra. Not sure when this version was introduced into Australia, but probably around the same time. It was certainly the phonetic alphabet in use in Australia by the mid-1960s.

Still, this is straying from Tony's original question: the origin and date of the parody.

Mike

Last edited by Mike Cecil; 07-05-18 at 22:53.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-18, 23:16
Richard Farrant's Avatar
Richard Farrant Richard Farrant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 3,641
Default

I think what Tony has here is a version of the Cockney Alphabet, the following link comes from a Sydney newspaper website;
https://www.smh.com.au/news/Big-Ques...582700584.html

regards, Richard
__________________
Richard

1943 Bedford QLD lorry - 1941 BSA WM20 m/cycle - 1943 Daimler Scout Car Mk2
Member of MVT, IMPS, MVG of NSW, KVE and AMVCS
KVE President & KVE News Editor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-18, 01:46
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Farrant View Post
I think what Tony has here is a version of the Cockney Alphabet, ...

regards, Richard
Richard, thank you that is a much fuller list, but it still doesn't nail down the original source (but does mention the possibility of British comedians of the 30's and 40's). I think this might be a popular culture thing that has been forgotten in the mists of time, I was hoping someone might say "Ahh yes that was part of such and such's radio play, or it was seen in this such movie".
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-05-18, 03:01
Mike K's Avatar
Mike K Mike K is offline
Fan of Lord Nuffield
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 5,865
Default phonetic

I believe the early 1920's British wireless sets were known as Ack and Charlie sets. BTW a local here has an original case for a Ack set, it has the appearance of being made by a cabinetmaker

I learnt the modern phonetics when I was studying for a ham radio license, it was part of the regulations syllabus. With all of the other crap that is now little used PAN PAN PAN
__________________
1940 cab 11 C8
1940 Morris-Commercial PU
1941 Morris-Commercial CS8
1940 Chev. 15cwt GS Van ( Aust.)
1942-45 Jeep salad
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-05-18, 01:35
Tony Smith's Avatar
Tony Smith Tony Smith is offline
No1, Mk 2** (I'm back!)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lithgow, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Cecil View Post
The 1952 War Office Signals Pam lists the phonetic alphabet that includes S for Sugar, but the 1955 pam lists the NATO standardised phonetic alphabet which includes S for Sierra. Not sure when this version was introduced into Australia, but probably around the same time. It was certainly the phonetic alphabet in use in Australia by the mid-1960s.

Mike
It was obviously an evolving system.

The 1907 (printed 1911) manual lists the partial alphabet in use at the
time, since telephony was still rather new:

"The letters T, A, B, M, S, P and V will be called Toc, Ack,
Beer, Emma, Esses, Pip and Vic respectively, so as to
phonetically distinguish them from similarly sounding letters,
and to ensure uniformity, no other names will be given them
or to any of the other letters of the alphabet."

(Page 220 of "Training Manual - Signalling, 1907 (Reprinted, with
amendments to 1st May 1911) Part III, Chapter XI, Section 216 -
Course of Instruction, Subsection 7, paragraph 3".)

I find that odd, as C or E are not mentioned and do sound like T, B or V, while A doesn't readily sound like any other letter and shouldn't require Ack.
__________________
You can help Keep Mapleleafup Up! See Here how you can help, and why you should!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016