MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-10-17, 07:52
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,675
Default

Just had a look at Dakin. Interesting bloke. Absolutely no military experience or qualifications on the requirements of battlefield camouflage but knew a lot about fish.

In the end, a camouflage system can only be judged subjectively by human observation and probably anyone with a bit of common sense could have come up with equally efficient, or inefficient, schemes given the facilities and trials he had access to.

Still, nobody in Australia was an expert in 1940, so they must have figured a bloke who knew how fish avoided being eaten must be just the shot for hiding tanks on a battlefield.

Lang

http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/dakin-william-john-5863
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-10-17, 06:42
Tony Wheeler's Avatar
Tony Wheeler Tony Wheeler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yarra Junction VIC
Posts: 953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
Absolutely no military experience or qualifications on the requirements of battlefield camouflage
Yes but you could say the same about CSIRO scientists consulted by Army in modern camo development. That’s all Dakin was for the military – a technical consultant. He only had authority over civil camouflage.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
anyone with a bit of common sense could have come up with equally efficient, or inefficient, schemes given the facilities and trials he had access to.
“In point of fact, excellent results can often be obtained by the exercise of common sense, imagination, and attention to detail; it is only in exceptional cases that the services of a specially trained officer should be required.”

EXCEPT…

“Disruptive painting is a positive menace when executed by the inexperienced; it should be left to experts.”

(Training memo 1940)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
Still, nobody in Australia was an expert in 1940
Exactly Lang, that was the whole problem, all the experience and expertise was within AIF and RAAF who were absent at the time. Plus of course Dakin had the ear of Menzies and promoted himself as Technical Director of Camouflage.


Simple Rules for Camouflage. Extract from Training Memorandum No.36 of 1940.jpg

War Cabinet April 1941 Establishment of Camouflage Organization. - Copy.jpg
__________________
One of the original Australian CMP hunters.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-10-17, 11:35
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,675
Default

A great deal of effort was wasted on camouflage of vehicles and fixed establishments as there are so many "tells" that the ones actually hidden are outnumbered in nearly every occasion by those clearly identifiable.

Here is a huge scale camouflage scheme (Boeing, Douglas, Vultee and others had similar schemes). What a waste of time! Any town street directory from pre-war would have the factories clearly marked and their positions are in flashing lights with rivers, bridges and other major features as bomb aiming indicators. How do you hide a major runway system?

http://iloveww2warbirds.com/fake-roo...of-wwii-video/

Lang
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-10-17, 12:59
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,675
Default

Here are a couple of Salvo vehicles. Effectiveness of paint seems to depend on sunlight.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Camouflage.jpg (91.9 KB, 240 views)
File Type: jpg Camouflage1.jpg (54.4 KB, 4 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-10-17, 13:09
Mike K's Avatar
Mike K Mike K is offline
Fan of Lord Nuffield
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 5,865
Default salvo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lang View Post
Here are a couple of Salvo vehicles. Effectiveness of paint seems to depend on sunlight.

At least there is no doubt regarding the colour of the shield logo

Unless somebody wants to discuss the myriad variants of red

The second pic : The darker disruptive colour has a noticeable shine to it . Hmm
__________________
1940 cab 11 C8
1940 Morris-Commercial PU
1941 Morris-Commercial CS8
1940 Chev. 15cwt GS Van ( Aust.)
1942-45 Jeep salad
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-10-17, 07:23
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,675
Default

This is another Salvation Army vehicle with yet another scheme. First in good condition second after it ran over a mine.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Salvo4.JPG (156.0 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg Salvo3.JPG (153.6 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-10-17, 07:28
Lang Lang is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,675
Default

The Salvos are a gold mine on camouflage patterns. 5 trucks, 5 different paint schemes. I presume they conformed to the current army design as they would have been maintained by army workshops.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Salvo5.JPG (139.8 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg Salvo6.JPG (155.7 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sold: Aust International Army Vehicles Parts Catalogue Mike Cecil For Sale Or Wanted 2 09-11-14 12:38
For Sale: WWII Brit Vehicles lssah2025 For Sale Or Wanted 0 18-09-14 15:17
10,000 WWII Vehicles for Sale! Ed Storey The Softskin Forum 3 25-01-11 12:05
Aust. vehicles web site Mike K The Softskin Forum 1 22-07-09 04:00
WWII vehicles in Burma Hanno Spoelstra The Softskin Forum 0 03-04-06 01:38


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016