![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert, where is my thumbs up button? I like how you've thinned out the ends of the cross members. As per original?
It always surprises me how overbuilt this machinery is. Bob Carriere at the Hammond Barn showed me some CMP trailers a year ago. Those beasts are solid steel bar stock everywhere. The load factor would have been 100% greater, if the makers had chosen lighter materials or thinner stock. It makes me wonder whether anyone at HQ was even slightly concerned about fuel costs per ton per mile.
__________________
Terry Warner - 74-????? M151A2 - 70-08876 M38A1 - 53-71233 M100CDN trailer Beware! The Green Disease walks among us! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Terry, the front section carrying the locker and spare tire is separate from the tray entirely,it is an exact copy. The ends were scalloped to clear the fuel tank although I would think a lot of skin was lost opening the fuel tank as the clearance is so close. The tray although heavy had some quite considerable weak points; the last bearer that carries the tailgate only just sits on the chassis and relies on the next anchor point to hold it in place, in rough off road driving it would be highly liable to failure as all the vertical movement would go through the mortise joint..Where the tailgate catch is fixed you will see that the vertical steel support finishes two boards below the catch, this leaves the critical catch point (for the tailgate) only connected to the two horizontal boards without support from the vertical member. Maintenance of tightness in the hundred or so bolts not to mention the hundred screws would have kept the driver occupied in his "spare" time. It has been fun to do all the same.
Robert
__________________
Humber FV 1601 1954 Brockhouse Trailer one ton C60S 1942 C15 1942 C15A 1942 (unrestored) ACCO Mk3 ACCO Mk5 Ingersoll-Rand 100 type 40 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|